On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:08:52 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> So don't return -EAGAIN, even in the case of a gpu hang. Remap it to -EIO
> instead.
What I'd really like to see in this rather long commit message is what
exactly happens in this case that's being fixed (maybe I should know,
but I don't).
>
> This is a bit ugly because intel_ring_begin is all non-interruptible
> and hence only returns -EIO. But as the comment in there says,
> auditing all the callsites would be a pain.
>
> To avoid duplicating code, reuse i915_gem_check_wedge in __wait_seqno
> and intel_wait_ring_buffer. Also use the opportunity to clarify the
> different cases in i915_gem_check_wedge a bit with comments.
>
> v2: Don't access dev_priv->mm.interruptible from check_wedge - we
> might not hold dev->struct_mutex, making this racy. Instead pass
> interruptible in as a parameter. I've noticed this because I've hit a
> BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked) at the top of check_wedge. This has been
> added in
>
> commit b4aca0106c466b5a0329318203f65bac2d91b682
> Author: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
> Date: Wed Apr 25 20:50:12 2012 -0700
>
> drm/i915: extract some common olr+wedge code
>
> although that commit is missing any justification for this it. I guess
> it's just copy&paste, because the same commit add the same BUG_ON
> check to check_olr, where it indeed makes sense.
>
> But in check_wedge everything we access is protected by other means,
> so this is superflous. And because it now gets in the way (we add a
> new caller in __wait_seqno, which can be called without
> dev->struct_mutext) let's just remove it.
>
> v3: Group all the i915_gem_check_wedge refactoring into this patch, so
> that this patch here is all about not returning -EAGAIN to callsites
> that can't handle syscall restarting.
>
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 6 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index a0c15ab..ab9ade0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1330,6 +1330,8 @@ i915_gem_object_unpin_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object
> *obj)
>
> void i915_gem_retire_requests(struct drm_device *dev);
> void i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
> +int __must_check i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + bool interruptible);
>
> void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev);
> void i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 6a98c06..af6a510 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1863,11 +1863,10 @@ i915_gem_retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> }
>
> -static int
> -i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +int
> +i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + bool interruptible)
> {
> - BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dev->struct_mutex));
> -
> if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged)) {
> struct completion *x = &dev_priv->error_completion;
> bool recovery_complete;
> @@ -1878,7 +1877,16 @@ i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> recovery_complete = x->done > 0;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
>
> - return recovery_complete ? -EIO : -EAGAIN;
> + /* Non-interruptible callers can't handle -EAGAIN, hence return
> + * -EIO unconditionally for these. */
> + if (!interruptible)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + /* Recovery complete, but still wedged means reset failure. */
> + if (recovery_complete)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1932,6 +1940,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> u32 seqno,
> unsigned long timeout_jiffies;
> long end;
> bool wait_forever = true;
> + int ret;
>
> if (i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring), seqno))
> return 0;
> @@ -1963,8 +1972,9 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> u32 seqno,
> end = wait_event_timeout(ring->irq_queue, EXIT_COND,
> timeout_jiffies);
>
> - if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged))
> - end = -EAGAIN;
> + ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv, interruptible);
> + if (ret)
> + end = ret;
> } while (end == 0 && wait_forever);
>
> getrawmonotonic(&now);
> @@ -2004,7 +2014,7 @@ i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> uint32_t seqno)
>
> BUG_ON(seqno == 0);
>
> - ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv);
> + ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv, dev_priv->mm.interruptible);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 501546e..6c024d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1220,8 +1220,10 @@ int intel_wait_ring_buffer(struct intel_ring_buffer
> *ring, int n)
> }
>
> msleep(1);
> - if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged))
> - return -EAGAIN;
> +
> + ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv,
> dev_priv->mm.interruptible);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> } while (!time_after(jiffies, end));
> trace_i915_ring_wait_end(ring);
> return -EBUSY;
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
