On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Yep, that's correct. For the first issue Peter Ross is working on some
> patches, for the later I suspect the missing CEA support. Please try this
> out by grabbing the kernel tree I've told you and running it. Peter's
> patches are on this
We've seen a few patches now which switch the flush enable bit from bit
11 to bit 12 (as the documentation suggests it should be). However this
turned out to be problematic for us.
The simulator has shed some light for us. It's not bit 11, and it's not
bit 12; it's both. Instead of renaming the bi
We've seen a few patches now which switch the flush enable bit from bit
11 to bit 12 (as the documentation suggests it should be). However this
turned out to be problematic for us.
The simulator has shed some light for us. It's not bit 11, and it's not
bit 12; it's both. Instead of renaming the bi
On 01/18/2012 06:36 AM, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
Wasn't DRI1 ripped from mesa as well?
Yes it was, though theoretically you can still build DRI1 drivers from
7.11 and load them with 8.0.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http:/
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:08:55PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Vetter
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:39:40 -0200
Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2012/1/18 Peter Ross :
> > This patch set enables enables interlaced mode output on
> > generation 3 and above chipsets.
>
> I just tested that on HDMI.
>
> The "interlace_allowed=1" patch seems fine: it made xrandr list more
> mo
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:08:55PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:18PM +0
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:47:21PM +0100, Angela Schmid wrote:
>> Hello Alfonso
>>
>>
>>
>> The patches are not yet merged
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=history;f=drivers/gpu/drm/i915;hb=HEAD
>>
>>
>>
>>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:08:55PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:18PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > here is mine. Let me k
Hi
2012/1/18 Peter Ross :
> This patch set enables enables interlaced mode output on
> generation 3 and above chipsets.
I just tested that on HDMI.
The "interlace_allowed=1" patch seems fine: it made xrandr list more
modes. But I believe patch 1 is still not correct. I tested that and
instead of
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:47:21PM +0100, Angela Schmid wrote:
> Hello Alfonso
>
>
>
> The patches are not yet merged
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=history;f=drivers/gpu/drm/i915;hb=HEAD
>
>
>
> I also don't see them at the repository I received from D
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:08:55PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:18PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > here is mine. Let me know if you need any other log.
> >
> > Ok, your TV only reports
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:51:30AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:17:52 +, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:24:26 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:16:02AM +0100, CC wrote:
> > > > I attached the error state.
> > >
> > > Nice on
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:17:52 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:24:26 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:16:02AM +0100, CC wrote:
> > > I attached the error state.
> >
> > Nice one, your gpu seems to have simply disappeared. And the ringbuffer
> > contai
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:29, Peter Ross wrote:
> This patch set enables enables interlaced mode output on
> generation 3 and above chipsets.
>
> History here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
>
> It has been tested on the following hardware:
> * ASUS P5E-VM-HDMI (G35_G) and LG
Hello Alfonso
The patches are not yet merged
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=history;f=drivers/gpu/drm/i915;hb=HEAD
I also don't see them at the repository I received from Daniel
https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/keithp/linux.git;a=history;f=driver
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:29:23 +1100
Peter Ross wrote:
> This patch set enables enables interlaced mode output on
> generation 3 and above chipsets.
>
> History here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
>
> It has been tested on the following hardware:
> * ASUS P5E-VM-HDMI (G35_G)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:18PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is mine. Let me know if you need any other log.
>
> Ok, your TV only reports 1080i as a mode (at least that's the only thing
> your kernel can decode). The
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Danie
Signed-off-by: Peter Ross
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
index e799e85..c243141 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/
Signed-off-by: Peter Ross
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
index f7b9268..03a84f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/
The I945, I965, IronLake and SandyBridge chipsets expect vertical timings in
frame units, whereas the DRM subsystem uses field units internally for
interlaced modes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ross
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 del
This patch set enables enables interlaced mode output on
generation 3 and above chipsets.
History here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
It has been tested on the following hardware:
* ASUS P5E-VM-HDMI (G35_G) and LG 32FS4D (VGA and SDVO connectors)
* Intel DQ45CB (Q45_G) and So
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone
> > > wrote:
> > > > Does what it says on the box.
> >
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone
> > wrote:
> > > Does what it says on the box.
> >
> > Danvet can you please test this on your elderly i810 box and make
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Does what it says on the box.
>
> Danvet can you please test this on your elderly i810 box and make sure
> we don't accidentally open the can of worms. Any sign of regressio
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:24:26 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:16:02AM +0100, CC wrote:
> > I attached the error state.
>
> Nice one, your gpu seems to have simply disappeared. And the ringbuffer
> contains a rather peculiar cmd sequence. Putting Chris (maybe he
> recognize
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:54, Angela Schmid wrote:
> Hello Daniel
>
>>Your TV likely sends a CEA block with some HDMI default modes set. Since
>>linux-3.3-rc1 (to be released in a few days) we should be able to decode that.
>>Can you grab the latest -linus kernel git and try that?
>
> I wanted to
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Does what it says on the box.
Danvet can you please test this on your elderly i810 box and make sure
we don't accidentally open the can of worms. Any sign of regressions?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
__
29 matches
Mail list logo
