Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915: Add native backlight control

2011-01-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:36:54 +0100 Sedat Dilek wrote: > ( Original posting from [1] ) > > I have the backlight-type patchset for months in my patch-series (and > maintained them if necessary against daily linux-next). > Also the last series from 14-Jan-2011 (see 1-5 patch from [2] and the > fol

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915: Add native backlight control

2011-01-20 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:03:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > I updated the new drivers/video/backlight/adp5520_bl.c, but there's a > decent chance that unconverted drivers will sneak in. I trust they > will still work OK? They should fire a warning on registration but otherwise work. I'll sen

[Intel-gfx] Driver update install problem

2011-01-20 Thread Robert Simmons
I have hit a wall in trying to update the xf86-video-intel driver to 2.14.0. After installing the 2.14.0 version of the driver all I see is a black screen with a mouse cursor after booting. First off I am using the following system: Acer Aspire 3680-2633 Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integ

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recognise non-VGA display devices

2011-01-20 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:49:59 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes), >> > the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as seconda

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915: Add native backlight control

2011-01-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:59 + Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330 > > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > > > > > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > > > > I tried to apply this patch but I get: > > > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915: Add native backlight control

2011-01-20 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330 > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > > > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > > > I tried to apply this patch but I get: > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function > > > 'intel_panel_setup_backli

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recognise non-VGA display devices

2011-01-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:49:59 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes), > > the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as secondary to a discrete GPU. Prior, > > it would simply disable the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915: Add native backlight control

2011-01-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330 Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > > I tried to apply this patch but I get: > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function > > 'intel_panel_setup_backlight': > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:319: error: 'struct > > bac

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recognise non-VGA display devices

2011-01-20 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes), > the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as secondary to a discrete GPU. Prior, > it would simply disable the integrated GPU. In such a configuration, the > IGFX is not a primar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915: Add native backlight control

2011-01-20 Thread Ali Gholami Rudi
Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > I tried to apply this patch but I get: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function > 'intel_panel_setup_backlight': > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:319: error: 'struct > backlight_properties' has no member named 'type' > drivers/gpu/drm/i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915: Add native backlight control

2011-01-20 Thread Ali Gholami Rudi
Hi, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Not all systems expose a firmware or platform mechanism for changing the > backlight intensity on i915, so add native driver support. After switching to 2.6.38-rc1 from 2.6.37 /sys/devices/virtual/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness disappeared and I cannot control the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG] 2.6.38-rc1-git1: hard lockup related to i915 / automated cgroup scheduling

2011-01-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Knut Petersen wrote: > Kernel 2.6.38-rc1 and -git1 will lock my AOpen i915GMm-HFS > at the end of  KDE startup if automatic process group scheduling > is actived in kernel config. A hard reset is necessary. > Without automatic process group scheduling everything is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recognise non-VGA display devices

2011-01-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:04:16 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:07:07 +, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > > + if (dev_priv->is_vga) { > > + /* If we have > 1 VGA cards with a single output, > > +* then disable the radeon VGA resources. > > +*/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recognise non-VGA display devices

2011-01-20 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:07:07 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > + if (dev_priv->is_vga) { > + /* If we have > 1 VGA cards with a single output, > + * then disable the radeon VGA resources. > + */ Why does this say 'radeon'? -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgp4

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recognise non-VGA display devices

2011-01-20 Thread Chris Wilson
Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes), the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as secondary to a discrete GPU. Prior, it would simply disable the integrated GPU. In such a configuration, the IGFX is not a primary VGA controller and so should not take part in VGA arbitratio