[Intel-gfx] Intel 2010Q3 release

2010-09-29 Thread Jin, Gordon
Hi, We'd like to announce Intel 2010Q3 graphics package. Please check http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2010Q3.html for the recommended stack, new features and known issues. Thanks community for helping improving the drivers. If you find any new issues, please file bugs referring to http://intel

[Intel-gfx] Subject: [PATCH v4] i915: Added function to initialize VBT settings

2010-09-29 Thread Simon Que
Hi all, I have updated the patch slightly. The title has been changed to remove the reference to Chromium. I have also re-generated it against drm-intel-next. Thanks, Simon === >From 070ccd99c1f2bb6c3df40c75aa4752ac01a67e45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] CHROMIUM: i915: Added function to initialize VBT settings

2010-09-29 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 10:34 +0100 schrieb Chris Wilson: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:12:16 -0700, Simon Que wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have updated the patch containing the dither bit change and VBT > > default settings. This time, all default values have been moved to a > > single function

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.902

2010-09-29 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 05:53:53 Carl Worth wrote: > This is the second release candidate in preparation for the upcoming > 2.13.0 release. This comes exactly one week after 2.12.902 and includes > only a handful of changes. > > One significant change is that the driver now requires libdrm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] CHROMIUM: i915: Added function to initialize VBT settings

2010-09-29 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:12:16 -0700, Simon Que wrote: > Hi all, > > I have updated the patch containing the dither bit change and VBT > default settings. This time, all default values have been moved to a > single function, init_vbt_defaults. This function is called from > intel_init_bios before

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time to wrap up -next

2010-09-29 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:19:00 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > No new stuff for now, but FYI current -next has kms regression for me > and haihao on sandybridge's LVDS and VGA, -fixes works fine. > > I haven't done bisect yet. Hopefully will be simple enough to fix... Thanks for the warning. -Chris -