Hi,
Krzysztof Halasa (1):
Allow interlaced modes.
this is a good news hopefully it applies to i915 Clarkdale proc.
IS there any special requirement in order to make the interlace mode work?
like kernel version, etc
thanks all for the hard work in supporting these linux drivers
thanks
X
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:00:23 +0800 (SGT), Val Ferdinand Caro
wrote:
> I am doing a simple DDC/CI app (change brightness/contrast/etc...) For this
> project I am scanning the PCI bus, identifying the device, getting the base
> address and mapping it. Then using I2C bit algorithm on each GPIO reg
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:26:45 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
wrote:
> On Mi 22.Sep'10 at 15:29:56 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > So we detect a rogue SVideo connection and do not have a free crtc for the
> > valid VGA output. The implication is that the TV detection is not working,
> > can you add a msl
On Mi 22.Sep'10 at 15:29:56 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:42:55 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
> wrote:
> > I pulled the branch again and the external monitor in the VGA port
> > still does not work (but no 1 sec delay).
>
> I overlooked this:
>
> [1.284053] [drm:drm_helper_
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:35:50 +0100, Owain Ainsworth
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:47:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Without this change, DRI2 gets enabled but doesn't work and glxinfo
> > crashes my X server.
>
> I think we need a bigger hammer than this.
>
> The problem is that wh
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:42:55 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
wrote:
> I pulled the branch again and the external monitor in the VGA port
> still does not work (but no 1 sec delay).
I overlooked this:
[1.284053] [drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes],
[CONNECTOR:11:SVIDEO-1]
[1.284057] [
Its enough to comment the two uses of DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP out in my case.
Runs fine on 2.6.34.7 + libdrm-2.4.21 :)
- Clemens
2010/9/22 Marc Deop i Argemí :
> On Wednesday 22 September 2010 02:48:32 Carl Worth wrote:
>> This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
>> 2.13
On Mi 22.Sep'10 at 11:57:42 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:48:23 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
> wrote:
> > On Mi 22.Sep'10 at 9:43:47 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > That'll be SDVO, I guess. On the one machine I have that actually uses
> > > SDVO, it doesn't seem to like GMBUS
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:47:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Without this change, DRI2 gets enabled but doesn't work and glxinfo
> crashes my X server.
I think we need a bigger hammer than this.
The problem is that when we disable acceleration (EIO returned from
execbuffer), the same thing h
Becareful during list processing to keep valgrind quiet:
==2989== Invalid read of size 4
==2989==at 0x48CE6B5: DrawableGone (glxext.c:168)
==2989==by 0x809F401: FreeResource (resource.c:601)
==2989==by 0x80845CE: ProcDestroyWindow (dispatch.c:733)
==2989==by 0x8087D76: Dispatch (di
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:47:27 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Without this change, DRI2 gets enabled but doesn't work and glxinfo
> crashes my X server.
Like this?
==2989== Invalid write of size 4
==2989==at 0x48CE6E5: DrawableGone (glxext.c:169)
==2989==by 0x809F401: FreeResource (resourc
Without this change, DRI2 gets enabled but doesn't work and glxinfo
crashes my X server.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
---
src/intel_driver.c | 13 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/intel_driver.c b/src/intel_driver.c
index c0ad69e..ad90174 100644
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:12:44 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-09-22 02:48 +0200, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> > This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> > 2.13.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from
> > testing of this snapshot.
>
> It fails to b
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 02:48:32 Carl Worth wrote:
> This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> 2.13.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from
> testing of this snapshot.
Can't build it:
intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_output_get_modes’:
inte
On 2010-09-22 02:48 +0200, Carl Worth wrote:
> This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> 2.13.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from
> testing of this snapshot.
It fails to build here with libdrm 2.4.21 because DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP
is not #defined
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:48:23 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
wrote:
> On Mi 22.Sep'10 at 9:43:47 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > That'll be SDVO, I guess. On the one machine I have that actually uses
> > SDVO, it doesn't seem to like GMBUS. The joy of hardware.
>
> The external monitor is on VGA1 and i
On Mi 22.Sep'10 at 9:43:47 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:32:55 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
> wrote:
> > On Di 21.Sep'10 at 8:55:44 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:35:27 +0100
> > > Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:22:00 +0200,
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:32:55 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
wrote:
> On Di 21.Sep'10 at 8:55:44 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:35:27 +0100
> > Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:22:00 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
> > > wrote:
> > > > [0.954724] ACPI: Batter
On Di 21.Sep'10 at 8:55:44 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:35:27 +0100
> Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:22:00 +0200, "Carlos R. Mafra"
> > wrote:
> > > [0.954724] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
> > > [2.266008] [drm:intel_lvds_set_powe
19 matches
Mail list logo
