On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:51:33PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Daniel,
> TTM releases the spinlock protecting the drm_mm manager in between
> evictions to be able to wait (without holding locks) for bo idle.
> That means that the lru list may have changed between the first
> eviction and the n
On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 10:00:10 +0100, Simon Farnsworth
wrote:
> > Bear in mind that I don't have to use VAAPI to call your ioctl; I can
> > write evil code that calls it directly. On the other hand, you can't
> > remove the ioctl later - users will wa
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:33:28PM +0800, Zou Nan hai wrote:
> The patch series try to abstruct ring buffer
> structure, implement BSD (bit stream decoder) ring
> buffer for H.264/VC1 VLD decoding.
>
> I mark this as V1 for review.
Woot, we're (slowly) getting there. I'll do an in-depth revie
On Wed, 19 May 2010 18:57:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:06:52AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The next adaptation I did was to clean up evict_something to add objects
> > from the inactive, active&&!pinned&&!write, flushing&&!pinned,
> > active&&!pinned&&write lists.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Only ever assigned, never used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
>
> NAK
>
> private was to be use when doing range restricted allocation
> somehow the patch t
On Wed, 19 May 2010 10:00:10 +0100, Simon Farnsworth
wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 May 2010, "Zou, Nanhai" wrote:
> > Currently we do not find any regression or slowness. We have been
> > testing
> > full HD video test along with regression tests for more than 1 month. The
> > only slowness we f
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:06:52AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2010 23:11:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series implements the fair-lru eviction Chris Wilson already
> > posted with a twist. It's essentially the same idea & algorithm.
> > Differne
implement BSD (bit stream decoder) ring buffer
for H.264/VC1 VLD decoding on G45+
Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai
Signed-off-by: Xiang Hai hao
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c |2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 103 ++
mark gem object on which ring with exec flag.
request list and active_list were moved into
intel_ring_buffer structure.
Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai
Signed-off-by: Xiang Hai hao
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i91
introduce intel_ring_buffer structure, convert render ring buffer to
use the structure.
Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai
Signed-off-by: Xiang Hai hao
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |8 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 153
The patch series try to abstruct ring buffer
structure, implement BSD (bit stream decoder) ring
buffer for H.264/VC1 VLD decoding.
I mark this as V1 for review.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.or
On Wednesday 19 May 2010, "Zou, Nanhai" wrote:
> Currently we do not find any regression or slowness. We have been
> testing
> full HD video test along with regression tests for more than 1 month. The
> only slowness we find now is with playing 2 1080p H.264 video. That was
> caused by too
On Tue, 18 May 2010 23:11:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series implements the fair-lru eviction Chris Wilson already
> posted with a twist. It's essentially the same idea & algorithm.
> Differnences versus his patch:
> - Doesn't do any allocations while scanning.
> - Im
13 matches
Mail list logo
