t;>> the market had support for it. Probably 5-10 years after that before
>>> support is widely available.
>>>
>>> IPv10 would delay and confuse deployment of something that is not IPv4.
>>> While IPv6 is not perfect, there are now hundreds of millions of
>&
rom: Lee Howard [mailto:l...@asgard.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 5:35 PM
> To: Khaled Omar; Jen Linkova
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
>
>
>
> On 3/31/17, 10:02 AM, "Int-area on behalf of Khaled Omar"
>
whether or not to charter it. Afterward, the RG intends to
meet at 1-3 IETF meetings per year, and hold one workshop per year, collocated
with a related academic conference.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
ht
s DNS servers.
I apologia if it's been discussed before and rejected (I did not find
such discussion on the list).
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
I'm a bit confused. Which standard would need to be updated if
the proposed recommendation is made?
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
ionally*, it’s bad practice to indicate “SHOULD” unless the text
> >> also explains why it isn’t a MUST, i.e., under what conditions it is OK to
> >> not forward fragments.
> >
> > Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Which standard would need to be updated if
and money) into
developing new solutions for the legacy protocol version. Especially
as we expect IPv4 to decline over time.
Am I missing some key benefits of the proposed solution which would
make IPREF attractive enough to deploy instead of existing solutions?
--
SY, Jen Linkova
on of an ICMP Multi-part Extension
>>to carry the original IPv6 source address of ICMPv6 messages
>>translated to ICMP by stateless (RFC6145) or stateful (RFC 6146)
>>protocol translators.
>>
>> ___
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
> ___
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
--
Cheers, Jen Linkova
___
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
rom:
Date: Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 5:28 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-equinox-intarea-icmpext-xlat-source-01.txt
To: David 'equinox' Lamparter , Jen Linkova
A new version of Internet-Draft
draft-equinox-intarea-icmpext-xlat-source-01.txt has been successfully
submitted by Je
-00.html
>> HTMLized:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-equinox-intarea-icmpext-xlat-source
>>
>>
>> Abstract:
>>
>>This document suggests the creation of an ICMP Multi-part Extension
>>to carry the original IPv6 source address of ICMPv6 messages
>&g
__________
> Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
--
Cheers, Jen Linkova
___
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
of
IP/ICMP translators [RFC7915]."
IMHO it would be desirable to rephrase "defaults to off" using
normative language.
Thanks!
--
Cheers, Jen Linkova
___
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
torial comments.
>
> Ron
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> ________
> From: Jen Linkova via Datatracker
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2025 6:02 AM
> To: ops-...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-icmp-exten-hdr-len@ietf.org
> ; int-area@ietf
Document: draft-ietf-intarea-icmp-exten-hdr-len
Title: ICMP Extension Header Length Field
Reviewer: Jen Linkova
Review result: Has Nits
The document is short and straitforward.
I do have one general question - more for the resposible AD, probably, and a
few editorial comments - please treat them
14 matches
Mail list logo
