Waldemar, Would you be able to elaborate on the problem statement and the benefits of the proposed solution?
After reading the draft and listening to the presentation I'm not sure I fully understand the problem. It looks like your goal is to achieve a kind of end2end. However: 1) We do not need anything for IPv6-to-IPv6 end2end. 2) For IPv6-to-IPv4 we have NAT64, and for IPv4-to-IPv6 we have SIIT. 3) For IPv4-to-IPv4 we have some forms of NAT-T and STUN. If your goal is to replace #2 and #3 with a one protocol to rule them all, I'm not sure we shall put too much effort (time and money) into developing new solutions for the legacy protocol version. Especially as we expect IPv4 to decline over time. Am I missing some key benefits of the proposed solution which would make IPREF attractive enough to deploy instead of existing solutions? -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
