Re: [Int-area] Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-19 Thread Templin (US), Fred L
Tim and Gorry, thank you for this meeting report-out. I have a draft out right now that I think addresses most if not all of the points regarding larger packet sizes. The draft was aligned with intarea for a long time but was recently re-aligned with 6man and refactored to focus on IPv6. I did l

Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-19 Thread Templin (US), Fred L
Herbie, an alternative to trying to force advanced integrity checks into hardware is for the source to include a higher fidelity integrity check along with the jumbo, then the destination gets to verify the integrity after the jumbo has traversed the path. That way, there is still good integrity

Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-19 Thread Robinson, Herbie
At some point, it becomes ridiculous to keep band-aiding 40+ year old hardware designs with ever increasing software complexity. The hard thing to know is when you hit that tipping point. From: Templin (US), Fred L Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 4:44 PM To: Robinson, Herbie ; Paul Vixie ; T

Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-19 Thread Paul Vixie
Robinson, Herbie wrote on 2023-12-19 15:49: At some point, it becomes ridiculous to keep band-aiding 40+ year old hardware designs with ever increasing software complexity.  The hard thing to know is when you hit that tipping point. better things do come along. but without backward compatibili