Dear all,
We have had a very nice discussion in the previous thread about what kind of
features we would want from the Internet.
We wanted to come back on another interesting point that has been raised during
the side meeting held during IETF 112, namely is where the innovation
happening?
Le 15/12/2021 à 20:09, Carsten Bormann a écrit :
RFC 8930
It says:
VRB overcomes the limitations listed in Section 4. Nodes do not wait
for the last fragment before forwarding,
I did not to fragment, but to re-group.
Fragmentation and reassembly happening at the sender and receiver
Le 16/12/2021 à 10:09, Luigi Iannone a écrit :
Dear all,
We have had a very nice discussion in the previous thread about what
kind of features we would want from the Internet.
We wanted to come back on another interesting point that has been raised
during the side meeting held during IETF 112
Le 15/12/2021 à 04:40, Jiayihao a écrit :
Hello Alex,
Really agree on your views on "The Internet does no harm".
Sorry to make it confused by the term "Kernel". Actually I borrow
this term from Linux but do not want to correlate that to Linux. I
use this term because this item looks like th
Hi Alex,
Thanks, I might have been unclear.
By “where” I meant to make a difference between the core infrastructure and
“edges“, where the latter can be considered limited domains that need to
interconnect to the Internet (the core) but as well among them not necessarily
going through a centra
Le 16/12/2021 à 12:29, Luigi Iannone a écrit :
Hi Alex,
Thanks, I might have been unclear.
By “where” I meant to make a difference between the core
infrastructure and “edges“, where the latter can be considered
limited domains that need to interconnect to the Internet (the core)
but as wel
Hi Alex,
A few comments inline
L.
Sent from my iPad
> On 16 Dec 2021, at 12:48, Alexandre Petrescu
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Le 16/12/2021 à 12:29, Luigi Iannone a écrit :
>> Hi Alex,
>> Thanks, I might have been unclear.
>> By “where” I meant to make a difference between the core infrastructure
> On 16 Dec 2021, at 8:09 pm, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> We have had a very nice discussion in the previous thread about what kind of
> features we would want from the Internet.
>
> We wanted to come back on another interesting point that has been raised
> during the side mee
I sure hope you are wrong about where things are going. Because the
logical consequence of the placement and addressing picture you paint is
that all innovation in applications and uses of the Internet comes from
incumbent players who have the leverage and resources to be present at
almost all
> If we don't want to share a common transmission resource, then why do we need
> globally unique addresses to use in IP packet headers? Locally unique
> addresses would do just as well.
Just to answer this question specifically. We may not need globally unique
addresses. But I need a unique ad
> On 17 Dec 2021, at 7:33 am, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> I sure hope you are wrong about where things are going.
so do I.
> Because the logical consequence of the placement and addressing picture you
> paint is that all innovation in applications and uses of the Internet comes
> from incum
11 matches
Mail list logo