Hi Alex,

Thanks, I might have been unclear.

By “where” I meant to make a difference between the core infrastructure and 
“edges“, where the latter can be considered limited domains that need to 
interconnect to the Internet (the core) but as well among them not necessarily 
going through a centralized service.

Is it clearer?

Ciao

L. 
 
> On 16 Dec 2021, at 11:00, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Le 16/12/2021 à 10:09, Luigi Iannone a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>> We have had a very nice discussion in the previous thread about what kind of 
>> features we would want from the Internet.
>> We wanted to come back on another interesting point that has been raised 
>> during the side meeting held during IETF 112, namely is where the innovation 
>> happening?
> 
> Do you mean on what layer in the stack is innovation happening?
> 
> Do you mean on which part of the network: the end node, the core?
> 
> Do you mean where on Earth is it happening?
> 
> Alex
> 
>> During the discussion in the side meeting, there was a short exchange 
>> between Dino, arguing about “decentralization”, and Michael stating that we 
>> are “rebuilding the edges”; the importance of the role of overlays was also 
>> briefly mentioned.
>> This is not a simple question, and may lead to an architectural argument, in 
>> line with Dirk K.’s viewpoint that only such architecture discussion may 
>> lead to possible changes to addressing, but also something that emerged in 
>> the previous thread. However, let’s at least start from the addressing 
>> perspective.
>> Rebuilding the edges and utilizing decentralization may point to some 
>> approach to addressing that is not governed by a common addressing scheme.
>> For instance, could we instead see a diversity of limited domain specific 
>> addressing schemes with most effort in ‘addressing’ being placed into the 
>> context translation that will need to inevitably happen? Or shall we instead 
>> follow the current path that forces the same context (IP semantics) to all 
>> participating edges (which goes counter the ‘rebuilding the edges’ comment)?
>> Hence the question we would like to discuss with you on: how/where 
>> innovation, realizing the features discussed in the previous thread, should 
>> happen?
>> This can help in strengthening the conclusion of the Problem Statement 
>> document 
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/
>>  
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/>),
>>  in order to provide input on which way to tackle the problem.
>> Luigi
>> (on behalf of the co-authors)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to