.
*From:*Luigi IANNONE
*Sent:* Wednesday, 19 October 2022 16:24
*To:* 'Luigi Iannone' ; int-area
*Subject:* RE: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
Hi All,
I think that we are all a bit busy before the cut-off date next Monday.
Let’s have a chat on the addressing and the
ubject: RE: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
Hi All,
I think that we are all a bit busy before the cut-off date next Monday.
Let’s have a chat on the addressing and the framework mentioned in the email
thread during 115 IETF in London.
We need to understand what is feasible and, more impor
Le 21/10/2022 à 20:50, John Gilmore a écrit :
Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
it might make sense to try to make IPv6 to be quantum resistant.
Relax, have no fear. Both IPv4 and IPv6 are already fully buzzword
compliant. They are climate change compatible,
I will not provoke, but one would n
Le 21/10/2022 à 16:24, Joel Halpern a écrit :
I am unable to parse the statement below as written. I presume I am
missing something that is clear to the writer.
I can understand asking that IKE(v3?) and IPSEC ESP be upgraded to
support quantum resistant algorithms.
How about IPsec AH ICV?
And Pro-Life? ;-)
Dino
> On Oct 21, 2022, at 11:50 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
>
> Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> it might make sense to try to make IPv6 to be quantum resistant.
>
> Relax, have no fear. Both IPv4 and IPv6 are already fully buzzword
> compliant. They are climate change compatible
Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> it might make sense to try to make IPv6 to be quantum resistant.
Relax, have no fear. Both IPv4 and IPv6 are already fully buzzword
compliant. They are climate change compatible, quantum resistant,
neutral to positive in political correctness, forward-looking to 5G,
I am unable to parse the statement below as written. I presume I am
missing something that is clear to the writer.
I can understand asking that IKE(v3?) and IPSEC ESP be upgraded to
support quantum resistant algorithms. As I understand it, the security
community is doing that. if there are
In this addressing discussion, I was thinking, thanks to a private
conversation with experts from a manufacturer, that it might make sense
to try to make IPv6 to be quantum resistant.
One might think IPv6 has nothing to do with it, but one should consider
the security aspects of IPv6 (IPsec, some
Hi All,
I think that we are all a bit busy before the cut-off date next Monday.
Let’s have a chat on the addressing and the framework mentioned in the email
thread during 115 IETF in London.
We need to understand what is feasible and, more importantly, if we have the
energy to do it.
Let’s mee
I am available to contribute.
Bob
[LI] Awesome :-)
___
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
Hi Robert,
A couple of comments inline.
From: Int-area On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 17:37
To: Jens Finkhaeuser ; Luigi Iannone
Cc: int-area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
On 9/30/22 05:20, Jens Finkhaeuser wrote:
Hi all,
since I
Hi Roland,
Please, see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Int-area On Behalf Of Bless, Roland (TM)
> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 13:03
> To: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
>
> Hi Luigi,
>
> sorry, I mess
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
Sorry, Fred, I responded quickly and did not include Aero. But then
my analysis of it is still weak. I need to dig deeper into it.
On 10/6/22 16:20, Templin (US), Fred L wrote:
>Can we actually produce some wider rang
here is called: “AERO”.
From: Robert Moskowitz [mailto:rgm-i...@htt-consult.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2022 1:42 PM
To: Templin (US), Fred L ; Jens Finkhaeuser
; Luigi Iannone
Cc: int-area
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
Sorry, Fred, I responded
ect:* Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
On 9/30/22 05:20, Jens Finkhaeuser wrote:
Hi all,
since I found myself contributing to the draft, it should be
obvious that I'm interested in continuing.
I think the proposed steps make a lot of sense. It should be
ert Moskowitz
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2022 8:37 AM
To: Jens Finkhaeuser ; Luigi Iannone
Cc: int-area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
On 9/30/22 05:20, Jens Finkhaeuser wrote:
Hi all,
since I found myself contributing to the draft, it should be obvious that I'm
inter
On 9/30/22 05:20, Jens Finkhaeuser wrote:
Hi all,
since I found myself contributing to the draft, it should be obvious
that I'm interested in continuing.
I think the proposed steps make a lot of sense. It should be fairly
obvious that the distinction between identifiers and locators alone
October 2022 18:08
To: Luigi Iannone; int-area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
Hi Luigi,
a related question would also be:
how much addressing semantics/context is required for performing (a) the
forwarding and/or (b) the routing decision inside a node?
Excellent questions
Hi Luigi,
see inline.
On 05.10.22 at 10:14 Luigi IANNONE wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Int-area On Behalf Of Bless, Roland (TM)
Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2022 18:08
To: Luigi Iannone; int-area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
Hi Luigi,
a related question
Hi Roland
> -Original Message-
> From: Int-area On Behalf Of Bless, Roland (TM)
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2022 18:08
> To: Luigi Iannone ; int-area
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
>
> Hi Luigi,
>
> a related question would als
Hi Luigi,
a related question would also be:
how much addressing semantics/context is required for performing (a) the
forwarding and/or (b) the routing decision inside a node?
Regards,
Roland
On 30.09.22 at 10:36 Luigi Iannone wrote:
Hi All,
During the last INTArea meeting the discussion on
Hi Jens,
A few comments inline.
From: Int-area On Behalf Of Jens Finkhaeuser
Sent: Friday, 30 September 2022 11:21
To: Luigi Iannone
Cc: int-area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Rebooting Addressing Discussion
Hi all,
since I found myself contributing to the draft, it should be obvious that I&#
Hi all,
since I found myself contributing to the draft, it should be obvious that I'm
interested in continuing.
I think the proposed steps make a lot of sense. It should be fairly obvious
that the distinction between identifiers and locators alone helps distinguish
between what and how, but th
23 matches
Mail list logo
