Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-19 Thread Paul Vixie
Robinson, Herbie wrote on 2023-12-19 15:49: At some point, it becomes ridiculous to keep band-aiding 40+ year old hardware designs with ever increasing software complexity.  The hard thing to know is when you hit that tipping point. better things do come along. but without backward compatibili

Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-19 Thread Robinson, Herbie
; Tom Herbert ; Christian Huitema Cc: Gorry (erg) ; int-area Subject: RE: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes [EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated from outside of Stratus Technologies. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender

Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-19 Thread Templin (US), Fred L
integrity coverage even if all links in the path are still only using CRC32. Fred From: Int-area On Behalf Of Robinson, Herbie Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 5:31 PM To: Paul Vixie ; Tom Herbert ; Christian Huitema Cc: Gorry (erg) ; int-area Subject: Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side

Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-18 Thread Tom Herbert
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 5:31 PM Robinson, Herbie wrote: > If we are going much beyond 9K, the hardware has to change, because a 32 > bit CRC doesn’t cut it for really large packets. > > > > If the hardware has to change, we can push MTU negotiation into the > hardware. And completely bypass the mo

Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

2023-12-18 Thread Robinson, Herbie
If we are going much beyond 9K, the hardware has to change, because a 32 bit CRC doesn’t cut it for really large packets. If the hardware has to change, we can push MTU negotiation into the hardware. And completely bypass the momentum involved with getting every existing implementation on the