[Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd

2023-07-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hello, Saw your presentation yesterday at masque and now read your draft. Fine by the overall approach, but I was wondering if you have considered to use DNS-SD (aka Bonjour)? I could see a proxy on the local network advertising its proxy service and the client « finding » the proxy by the DNS-

Re: [Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-00

2023-06-30 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
It does indeed seem cleaner ;-) From: Int-area on behalf of Tommy Pauly Date: Thursday, 29 June 2023 at 17:32 To: Erik Kline Cc: MASQUE , "int-area@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-00 Yes, it is an interesting outcome — but I think that in th

Re: [Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-00

2023-06-29 Thread Tommy Pauly
Yes, it is an interesting outcome — but I think that in the same was that a VPN interface is a PvD, a proxy configuration that can tunnel traffic (particularly in the case of CONNECT-IP proxies that support passing any and all IP traffic) is indeed a PvD with it’s own configuration. Rather than

Re: [Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-00

2023-06-28 Thread Erik Kline
Looks like an interesting proposal, and it raised an interesting point: that proxies can be provisioning domains unto themselves (this hadn't exactly occurred to me before, but makes sense). Looking forward to more discussion. Thanks, -ek On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 1:42 PM Tommy Pauly wrote: >

[Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-00

2023-06-28 Thread Tommy Pauly
Hello INTAREA and MASQUE, I wanted to share a new draft (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-00.html) that uses Provisioning Domains (from intarea-produced RFC 8801) to: - Discover URLs (and URL templates) of HTTP proxies such as MASQUE proxies that are provide