On Monday, July 9, 2001, at 10:40 AM, Greg Hewett wrote:
> I have a different problem with the MacOS X Mail. I cannot view
> messages in a mailbox that has subfolders. i.e. INBOX. I see my
> lowest level subfolders fine.
I believe this is a known "feature" of the MacOSX client - a mailbox c
I have a different problem with the MacOS X Mail. I cannot view
messages in a mailbox that has subfolders. i.e. INBOX. I see my
lowest level subfolders fine.
> Sorry for the ambiguity. The problem lies in the MacOS X Mail client,
> NOT in cyrus. When you try and select a subfolder, you get
--On Friday, July 06, 2001 12:48:13 PM -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Hey great! This will let me work around MacOS X's Mail program's
>> stupidity in this regard. Before I set up alt namespace, I couldn't get
>> to any of my folders besides the INBOX! Doesn't anyone read a
Michael Fair wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the clarifications.
>
> To finish up on a point that you didn't fully understand
> and to make a recommendation for your evaluation,
>
> > > - being more comfortable with the concept of being able to make
> > > subfolders of all mailboxes than I am w
Thanks for all the clarifications.
To finish up on a point that you didn't fully understand
and to make a recommendation for your evaluation,
> > - being more comfortable with the concept of being able to make
> > subfolders of all mailboxes than I am with any folder except INBOX,
>
> Not su
Michael Fair wrote:
>
> > That being said, I'm curious why you ask. Do you see some inherent flaw
> > in the current approach? Or do you just want to make sure that you
> > don't get bit by some incompatible change to the on-disk structure?
>
> I suppose there are a number of reasons I ask.
From: "Michael Fair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 13:24:04 -0700
[...]
This is pretty much what I was expecting. I would also imagine
that without a good tool migrate several thousands of mailboxes
changing the on-disk structure is not really an option. I
personal
>My intent right now is to keep the on-disk structure the same, but CMU
>_might_ have different ideas. There has been talk about making '/' the
>default and '.' an option, because it would make the code cleaner and
>possibly a little faster. But, this may or may not ever happen.
> My intent right now is to keep the on-disk structure the same, but CMU
> _might_ have different ideas. There has been talk about making '/' the
> default and '.' an option, because it would make the code cleaner and
> possibly a little faster. But, this may or may not ever happen.
So it is es
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 09:29:44 -0400
From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Oceana Matrix Ltd.
My intent right now is to keep the on-disk structure the same, but CMU
_might_ have different ideas. There has been talk about making '/' the
default and '.' an option
Michael Fair wrote:
>
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of a selectable hierarchy
> > separator for Cyrus IMAP. Up until now, Cyrus used a netnews-style
> > hierarchy, where '.' was used as the hierarchy delimiter -- thus
> > prohibiting '.' from appearing in mailbox names. This r
> I am pleased to announce the availability of a selectable hierarchy
> separator for Cyrus IMAP. Up until now, Cyrus used a netnews-style
> hierarchy, where '.' was used as the hierarchy delimiter -- thus
> prohibiting '.' from appearing in mailbox names. This release allows a
> UNIX-style '/'
Nick Sayer wrote:
>
> Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> >
> > Nick Sayer wrote:
> >
> >>Ken Murchison wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Nick Sayer wrote:
> >>>
> Hey great! This will let me work around MacOS X's Mail program's stupidity
> in this regard. Before I set up alt namespace, I couldn't get to any
Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> Nick Sayer wrote:
>
>>Ken Murchison wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Nick Sayer wrote:
>>>
Hey great! This will let me work around MacOS X's Mail program's stupidity
in this regard. Before I set up alt namespace, I couldn't get to any of my
folders besides the INBOX! Doesn't
Nick Sayer wrote:
>
> Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> >
> > Nick Sayer wrote:
> >>Hey great! This will let me work around MacOS X's Mail program's stupidity
> >>in this regard. Before I set up alt namespace, I couldn't get to any of my
> >>folders besides the INBOX! Doesn't anyone read an RFC anymore
Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> Nick Sayer wrote:
>>Hey great! This will let me work around MacOS X's Mail program's stupidity
>>in this regard. Before I set up alt namespace, I couldn't get to any of my
>>folders besides the INBOX! Doesn't anyone read an RFC anymore before they
>>write software? Shees
Nick Sayer wrote:
>
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of a selectable hierarchy
> > separator for Cyrus IMAP. Up until now, Cyrus used a netnews-style
> > hierarchy, where '.' was used as the hierarchy delimiter -- thus
> > prohibiting '.' from appearing in mailbox names. This rel
> I am pleased to announce the availability of a selectable hierarchy
> separator for Cyrus IMAP. Up until now, Cyrus used a netnews-style
> hierarchy, where '.' was used as the hierarchy delimiter -- thus
> prohibiting '.' from appearing in mailbox names. This release allows a
> UNIX-style '/'
Oops!
Due to a small oversight (and not checking the tar.gz) on my part, the
distribution that I created was essentially just an alt-namespace
distro. I have repackaged the correct code and uploaded it to the URLs
below. If you have already downloaded the code, please grab it again.
Note: If y
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:40:15 -0400
From: "Kevin J. Menard, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Hmm . . . This would be fine for me, but maybe someone else would run
into a problem with wanting to use '/' in a username (have no clue
why). In that case, an entry like "usesep: whatever_c
Hey Ken,
Thursday, July 05, 2001, 9:45:04 PM, you wrote:
KM> I am pleased to announce the availability of a selectable hierarchy
KM> separator for Cyrus IMAP. Up until now, Cyrus used a netnews-style
KM> hierarchy, where '.' was used as the hierarchy delimiter -- thus
KM> prohibiting '.' from
21 matches
Mail list logo
