hink I am doing what you are saying, since I have both email
addresses in the addresses section, or are you saying there is someplace
else that forwarded addresses should go?
thanks,
maria
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:47:50 +0200
> From: Michael Menge
> Subject: Re: sieve p
a vacation response.
~maria
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:45:26 -0400
From: Joseph Brennan
Subject: Re: sieve problem with vacation filter again.
To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Message-ID: <47d6211e92001626abbc9...@sodor.cc.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; forma
I have both addresses in the sieve rule. If you send a mail to the
address that gets forwarded, you do not get a response, but if you send
a mail to the direct address, you do get a vacation response.
~maria
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:45:26 -0400
> From: Joseph Brennan
> Subject:
Maria McKinley wrote:
> The only thing unusual about this account, that I can think of, is that
> he is forwarding mail to this account from other accounts.
Did you put those other addresses in the sieve rule?
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
Cyrus Home Page: h
Maria McKinley wrote:
> I had managed to get the vacation filter working for the user that was
> having problems by getting rid of the database and playing around with
> the filter forever, but it seems that the fix was only temporary. Other
> filters still work fine, and vacation filters for ot
--On Friday, March 21, 2008 13:12 +0100 Christoph Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Why this rule doesnt work?
>
> IF 'From:' contains '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND 'From:' contains
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND 'From:' contains '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> AND 'From:' contains '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' T
Markus Rebensburg schrieb:
>
> Can anybody help me? Is it a bug in cyrus?
>
>
I can help myself a bit :-)
I used the test program found in cyrus-imapd-2.2.12/sieve, it seems to
be a problem with the action_string defined while running the function
do_action_list. There is a fixed length defined
Ken Murchison wrote:
Yeah, the script for [EMAIL PROTECTED] has:
vacation :addresses "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ...
Yup...
This is obviously something that makes no sense and IMO falls under
the GIGO principal (garbage in, garbage out).
The vacation code checks the headers to make sure that o
Bob Tito wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Bob Tito wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Bob Tito wrote:
Hi all,
At the moment we seem to have a problem with sieve on our
cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 sytem (single instance message store ON)
Basically everthing works fine, but:
When a message is sent to 2 (or mor
Ken Murchison wrote:
Bob Tito wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Bob Tito wrote:
Hi all,
At the moment we seem to have a problem with sieve on our
cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 sytem (single instance message store ON)
Basically everthing works fine, but:
When a message is sent to 2 (or more?) recipients an
Bob Tito wrote:
Hi all,
At the moment we seem to have a problem with sieve on our
cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 sytem (single instance message store ON)
Basically everthing works fine, but:
When a message is sent to 2 (or more?) recipients and one has an
vacation message on with the email-address of t
>
>
> Andreas Winkelmann wrote:
>> Am Thursday 29 September 2005 20:19 schrieb synrat:
>>
>>
>>>freebsd 5.3, cyrus installed from ports with default options.
>>>
>>>cyrus-imapd-2.2.12_1
>>>cyrus-sasl-2.1.21
>>>cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.21
>>>
>>>all imap related stuff seems to work just fine, but si
Andreas Winkelmann wrote:
Am Thursday 29 September 2005 20:19 schrieb synrat:
freebsd 5.3, cyrus installed from ports with default options.
cyrus-imapd-2.2.12_1
cyrus-sasl-2.1.21
cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.21
all imap related stuff seems to work just fine, but sieve filters
don't seem to wor
Am Thursday 29 September 2005 20:19 schrieb synrat:
> freebsd 5.3, cyrus installed from ports with default options.
>
> cyrus-imapd-2.2.12_1
> cyrus-sasl-2.1.21
> cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.21
>
> all imap related stuff seems to work just fine, but sieve filters
> don't seem to work.
> I can create
Kent L. Nasveschuk wrote:
Hello,
I'm having a problem with sieve finding the correct mailbox
In a script when I use INBOX.backup the imapd.log says:
Jun 10 08:01:55 mail master[10743]: about to exec /usr/cyrus/bin/lmtpd
Jun 10 08:01:55 mail lmtpunix[10743]: executed
Jun 10 08:01:55 mail lmtpunix[10
Dmitry Alyabyev wrote:
Howdy
I'm using 2.2 branch for a while and sometimes I see problem of making
connection to sieve
It looks like TCP session is established but no banner appears.
Normaly I solve this by commenting/uncommenting corresponding line in cyrus.conf
and doing 'killall -HUP master'
Hi,
> Have you created each of the target folders? Cyrus doesn't create folders
> automatically, and will fallback to delivering to your INBOX if a given
> target folder doesn't exist.
yes, all the folders do exist. Is there maybe a posibility to debug timsieved?
> Failing that: are the ACLs on
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Michael Kaufmann wrote:
> I'm trying to get sieve working on my Cyrus IMAPD (2.1.13) but I can't
> get it working the way I want. I get a lot of mails from mailing lists
> every day and I want them to be moved fout of my INBOX into
> INBOX.ml:blah.blah but only the filter rule
Tested the begining squigle bracket on new line and it worked. One of
the things that I do also is incremental tests. So I start with one
rule and see if it works, then add another rule... and so on. Even
though sieveshell parses the script on put, it didn't always point me to
the problem.
On
I'm no sieve expert but this works on my system:
require ["fileinto"];
if header :contains "Sender" "owner-info-cyrus" {
fileinto "INBOX.lists.cyrus";
}
Did you include the require line? Or maybe sieve needs the opening
squigle bracket on the if line. Did you read the rfc?
On Sun, 2003-06-29
Rob Siemborski wrote:
I don't see why the bytecode version can't just have an "include" opcode,
followed by a string (stringlist?) of other files.
I didn't know if the bytecode was structured such that you can just
include the bytecode, or if more work would be required to munge them
together
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, John A. Tamplin wrote:
Would it be feasible to add an include or call facility into sieve?
This is something I've been interested in for a while, I just haven't had
time to throw together an I-D for it.
I hadn't thought of letting it include scripts out
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, John A. Tamplin wrote:
> Would it be feasible to add an include or call facility into sieve?
This is something I've been interested in for a while, I just haven't had
time to throw together an I-D for it.
I hadn't thought of letting it include scripts outside of the user's
pe
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've setup cyrus IMAP with sieve a few weeks ago. It works just fine for me!
But I couldn't find info how I can have global sieve rules. Is there a way to
set up global rules for all users defined by administrator? I want sometimes
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've setup cyrus IMAP with sieve a few weeks ago. It works just fine for me!
> But I couldn't find info how I can have global sieve rules. Is there a way to
> set up global rules for all users defined by administrator? I want sometimes
> change some ru
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:41:57PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>
> Patrick Welche wrote:
> >
> > Now sivtest, sieveshell (,imtest, mutt) are all happily connecting, but when
> > I actually try out the test sieve script, I get an lmtp mail delivery error(!)
> Looks like lmtpd couldn't find you
Patrick Welche wrote:
>
> Now sivtest, sieveshell (,imtest, mutt) are all happily connecting, but when
> I actually try out the test sieve script, I get an lmtp mail delivery error(!)
>
> This is the test script:
>
> require ["reject","fileinto"];
>
> if address :is :all "From" "[EMAIL PROTEC
5:07 PM
> To: Harris Landgarten
> Cc: Richard Gilbert; cyrus
> Subject: Re: sieve problem
>
> Harris Landgarten wrote:
> >
> > Will this patch work on 2.0.16?
>
> Yes. This is why I posted it (see Richards original post below).
>
> > On Wed, 200
manually with the same effect. Let me know if I am wrong.
Harris
-Original Message-
From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:07 PM
To: Harris Landgarten
Cc: Richard Gilbert; cyrus
Subject: Re: sieve problem
Harris Landgarten wrote:
>
> Wil
Harris Landgarten wrote:
>
> Will this patch work on 2.0.16?
Yes. This is why I posted it (see Richards original post below).
> On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:41, Ken Murchison wrote:
> >
> >
> > Richard Gilbert wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a sieve script set up which puts all mail from the info-cyr
Will this patch work on 2.0.16?
Harris
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:41, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>
> Richard Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > I have a sieve script set up which puts all mail from the info-cyrus list
> > into a folder using the rule
> >
> >if address :is :localpart ["to", "cc", "bcc"] "i
Richard Gilbert wrote:
>
> I have a sieve script set up which puts all mail from the info-cyrus list
> into a folder using the rule
>
>if address :is :localpart ["to", "cc", "bcc"] "info-cyrus" {
> fileinto "INBOX.info-cyrus"; }
>
> This works fine except for every message from Simo
prune wrote:
> hoops
> while looking at the log, I just saw :
> Mar 7 11:14:55 diamond timsieved[77218]: mkdir
> /usr/sieve/p/prune_lecentre_net: No such file or directory
> Mar 7 11:14:55 diamond timsieved[77218]: error in actions_setuser()
> Mar 7 11:14:56 diamond timsieved[77219]: mk
33 matches
Mail list logo
