Ken Murchison wrote:
>>Unable to connect to server at /usr/local/bin/installsieve line 121,
>> line 1.
>>I'm sure that my password is correct, because I'm able to connect to the
>>imap server. I tried passwd method and sasldb method, both does not work.
>>
>
> The installsieve program has bee
GOMBAS Gabor schrieb am Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 03:59:13PM +0100:
* On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:54:14AM +0100, Birger Toedtmann wrote:
*
* > But I have to admit: The SASL folks have fixed it very silenty
*
* I think there were some messages about it when it was fixed more than a year
* ago.
Ma
So no suggestions on this? =/ I'm definitely stuck.
--tom
-
Thomas C. Meggs
Assistant UNIX System Administrator
Physics and Astronomy Network Infrastructure and Computing
UNC Chapel Hill
http://www.panic.unc.edu/
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:21:27 -0500
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 12:45:35 +0100
From: Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is from lwn.net, latest. How large will the effect be for
cyrus-imapd? I guess this is a good reason to advize people to use
reiser or ext3 :) Tarjei
Honestly, I thought the +S bit already did fully s
Hi,
I decided to make a stack trace from imapd which finally resolved the segmentation
fault issue (indirectly):
#0 prot_printf (s=0x0, fmt=0x8081f99 "* BYE Fatal error: %s\r\n") at prot.c:616
616 assert(s->write);
(gdb) bt
#0 prot_printf (s=0x0, fmt=0x8081f99 "* BYE Fatal error: %s\r
Hey James,
Sunday, November 25, 2001, 5:28:08 AM, you wrote:
JS> What work has been done in this area please specify URLs to patches
JS> pertaining to this matter
Check the archives from this summer. There was quite a bit of discussion
going on between Devdas Bhagat, Ken, Larry, and myself o
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> > Tuesday, November 06, 2001, 7:44:04 AM, you wrote:
> > MF> If you decide that 1 IP per domain is not acceptable, which
> > MF> anybody who does lots of virtual hosting generally does, then
> > MF> I recomm
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:54:14AM +0100, Birger Toedtmann wrote:
> But I have to admit: The SASL folks have fixed it very silenty
I think there were some messages about it when it was fixed more than a year
ago.
Gabor
--
Gabor Gombas Eotvos Lorand Un
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 24.11.2001 at 22:30 Tarjei Huse wrote:
>Have you checked the cyrus-utils.sf.net/faq pages?
Now I have... :o)
>Mika Iisakkila wrote:
>>
>> Georg Altmann wrote:
>> > What does "signaled to death by 11 " mean? Is 11 a pid?
>>
>> No. That means the
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Mika Iisakkila wrote:
> Another pitfall is the Name Service Switch library. At least in Debian,
> /etc/nsswitch.conf specifies DB lookups (in addition to files) for
> services, and the daemons die because the lookup involves DB version 2,
> and the linker gets confused. Both D
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Tuesday, November 06, 2001, 7:44:04 AM, you wrote:
> MF> If you decide that 1 IP per domain is not acceptable, which
> MF> anybody who does lots of virtual hosting generally does, then
> MF> I recommend you apply the sep-heirarchy patch which will
Hi, has anyone come around to updating the sasl-ldap patch to 1.5.27?
Also: Please, please, please include ldap support in the final version of Sasl
V2!!
Tarjei
Hi,
This is from lwn.net, latest. How large will the effect be for cyrus-imapd? I
guess this is a good reason to advize people to use reiser or ext3 :) Tarjei
How synchronous should Linux be? One day, as Andrew Morton was wandering around
the filesystem code, he noticed a seeming inconsistency.
THIS IS SO COOL I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE IT HAPPENING!!! GREAT.
Tarjei
James Spooner wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm currently evaluating the possibility of modifying Cyrus to be fully LDAP
> driven, with multiple domain support (say domains/d/dom.com/users/j/james/
> type dirs etc) and login names like
> What do you mean, using multiple A records in round-robin? I think
> that's required, or at least, recommended behaviour. I don't know
> exactly how much benefit there is to being able to list multiple
> servers in a configuration file over being able to list multiple
> servers in DNS. Perhap
> But I have to admit: The SASL folks have fixed it very silenty
Yes. I must say. I follow this maillinglist partly to get such updates.
I hope the fine developers remember this 'till next time and send out an
announcement with lots of !! and ** and ## to make sure we understand what's
happe
Hi all.
I'm currently evaluating the possibility of modifying Cyrus to be fully LDAP
driven, with multiple domain support (say domains/d/dom.com/users/j/james/
type dirs etc) and login names like [EMAIL PROTECTED] for POP3 and IMAP.
Also negating the need to use cyradm to create mail directorys
Also Sprach Birger Toedtmann:
> Why that? SASL awaits its OK from PAM - which LDAP server PAM itself
> connected to is not SASLs business. (to avoid misunderstanding:
> we won't mix both methods, no).
Okay, I didn't look closely at the FAQ that explained why that was
happening, I just avoided
Wil Cooley schrieb am Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 12:36:33AM -0800:
* Also Sprach Birger Toedtmann:
^^^- whooa I'm not Nietzsche. Far from it. ;-)
*
* > We use SASL1->LDAP in a clusterd HA environment with the LDAP patch
* > supplied by http://www.surf.org.uk/src/cyrussasl.html which AF
Also Sprach Birger Toedtmann:
> We use SASL1->LDAP in a clusterd HA environment with the LDAP patch
> supplied by http://www.surf.org.uk/src/cyrussasl.html which AFAIK does
> not support multiple LDAP servers. We are at the moment suggensting
> a switch to SASL1->PAM->LDAP, which is not as fast,
Kevin J. Menard, Jr. schrieb am Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 11:30:36AM -0500:
[...]
* JW> Most of the LDAP libraries (for sure OpenLDAP which is what we are using) allow
* JW> you to specify multiple redundant LDAP servers in the list separated by spaces.
*
* If there's enough requests for it, I'll t
Ionut Nistor schrieb am Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 11:51:36PM +0200:
* Could anyone please take a look over this mail again ?
*
* I really do not know what's causing the problem but it seems kind of
* strange and it keeps appearing from time to time.
[...]
* >
* > At first everything worked fine. Howe
Wolfgang Trexler schrieb am Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 08:00:07PM +0100:
* Hi,
*
* I just found this posting on BUGTRAQ and was wondering I didn't read
* anything about it on this list...
Because it has been around for some time now, SuSE weren't very fast in
response. It was fixed in 1.5.27 which h
23 matches
Mail list logo
