I have had bad experience with Segate Hard drive.
Western Digital one should never buy. You don't want
to loose all your data and go to company for
replacement on their 3 year warantee. Segate worked a
little more than Wester Digital.
Naresh
--- nitin batra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mith
nitin batra wrote:
> Are u speaking out of your personal experience
> Or just like that!!!
> I am using two harddrives of seagate 20 GB ..5200 rpm
> for last one year ..and i had no problems with them
> NOne at all for that matter
>
> I am still under the impression that SEagate HDD
> provide v
Mithunji
Cud u clarify the following
>Hard disk wise all Seagate IDE hard disk available in Nehru Place, Delhi in
>the recent years are crap :). Other than that hard disk failures would have
>symptoms like files dissapearing mysteriously,
>DMA error's on the console and error messages in the
harya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "general linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "linux programmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Linux-India" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [ilugd]: Rhat 7.2 on 40GB hdd
> M
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:21:00PM +0530, Manish K Arya spoke out thus:
> hi
> i have installed Rhat 7.2 on 40 GB hdd.i m facing problems like
> 1)at reboot and halt sometimes system is not able to umount partitions
> 2)at many times i face kernel errors (like page fault,OOPs etc)
Do you have
Hello,
40 GB hard disk gives problem if u select
autodetect in bios.It sometimes detects wrong number
of cylinders.You can go to bios and select the
cylinder numbers given(written) on the hard disk and
also select the sector info etc... as given on hard
disk .
FRom
mOhit kHullar
--- M
hi
i have installed Rhat 7.2 on 40 GB hdd.i m facing problems like
1)at reboot and halt sometimes system is not able to umount partitions
2)at many times i face kernel errors (like page fault,OOPs etc)
does any can tell me is there something wrong with hdd.
i have heard that 40GB hdds give pro
