On 06.06.2012 12:09, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> not necessarily. In the first place, as far as I know, developers
> rarely
> package their own apps.
when requirements are gathered, seldom one has info as to who will
develop it. developers are rarely exposed to the requirements at the
initial st
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 21:45 +0530, ஆமாச்சு wrote:
> > Anyway if you have some experiences in these, please share.
> > (Koha has paid developers too)
> today a popular Open Source Software would mean that it has to be
> packaged & made readily available as binary for installation atleast
> in
>
On 06/05/2012 04:01 PM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
>
> the only one I am familiar with is django - they fix a rough date for
> release, but release when it is ready. They have rough list of features
> for release, but those features get included only if someone gets them
> ready. Same with translatio
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:08 +0530, ஆமாச்சு wrote:
> > this very rarely works out. My motto is - if you do not have a
> client,
> > do not write software.
>
> i am saying the practises adopted by Ubuntu, Fedora, Koha, Django,
> KDE,
> GNOME, OpenERP etc.,
>
> How they put forth a timeline for eve
On 06/05/2012 12:28 PM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> this goes for open source also. Most successful open source applications
> were originally developed for a client who paid for it and then made
> open source - examples are django and koha. Known as the 'sell it, free
> it' model.
yes. there are c
On 06/05/2012 12:28 PM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> this very rarely works out. My motto is - if you do not have a client,
> do not write software.
i am saying the practises adopted by Ubuntu, Fedora, Koha, Django, KDE,
GNOME, OpenERP etc.,
How they put forth a timeline for every release, call fo
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:16 +0530, ஆமாச்சு wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 10:32 AM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> > after some research, I find that this is the classic waterfall model
> of
> > software development,
>
> private software development goes this way - you develop something
> for
> someone.
thi
On 06/05/2012 10:32 AM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> after some research, I find that this is the classic waterfall model of
> software development,
private software development goes this way - you develop something for
someone.
When it comes to creations - you develop something & then reach out
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 16:49 +0530, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> I have had
> only 3 experiences in developing prop, and all ended up in my being
> booted out fairly early in the process, so I am not sure if my
> observations are accurate. The cycle as I see it is like this:
>
> 1. Sales meets the cl
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 20:46 +0530, Arun Khan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, kenneth gonsalves
> wrote:
>
> ... snip ...
>
> I will share my experience at a prop. software shop (Bell Labs).
>
> > 3. The design is then sent to production. The job is parceled out to
> > several teams, ea
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, kenneth gonsalves
wrote:
... snip ...
I will share my experience at a prop. software shop (Bell Labs).
> 3. The design is then sent to production. The job is parceled out to
> several teams, each team working in isolation from the other teams. I
> will not go int
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 21:41 +0530, Balachandran Sivakumar wrote:
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM, kenneth gonsalves
> wrote:
> > has anyone have any idea as to what is meant by 'software development
> > practices' and whether this term is applicable to open source software
> > d
Hello Animesh here,
.I am working as PHP web developer in Quadruple Business Services.I would
like to say irrespective of any technology s/w development practice is
followed whether it is open source or not.S/w development practice is
nothing but sdlc ie client requirement or gathering ,analysis,m
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 15:20 +0200, Krishna wrote:
> > has anyone have any idea as to what is meant by 'software
> development
> > practices' and whether this term is applicable to open source
> software
> > development?
> >
> >
> Can you please elaborate more in detail, in what context are you
> as
Hi Kenneth,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM, kenneth gonsalves
wrote:
> has anyone have any idea as to what is meant by 'software development
> practices' and whether this term is applicable to open source software
> development?
Software development practices are applicable to any
so
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM, kenneth gonsalves
wrote:
> hi,
>
> has anyone have any idea as to what is meant by 'software development
> practices' and whether this term is applicable to open source software
> development?
>
> I guess it refers to the workflow followed from the time you decide
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:02 PM, kenneth gonsalves
wrote:
> hi,
>
> has anyone have any idea as to what is meant by 'software development
> practices' and whether this term is applicable to open source software
> development?
>
>
Can you please elaborate more in detail, in what context are you ask
17 matches
Mail list logo
