Roshan George wrote:
Looks great.
A minor niggle, though. Why is the content license CC-BY-SA but the
license displayed on the page CC-BY-NC-ND?
Reading through the licenses, I thought CC-BY-NC-ND would be appropriate
too (along with Bala) since some of the content will only apply to
ilug
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:44 +0530, Vamsee Kanakala wrote:
> The code of the site is here: http://code.google.com/p/ilugc/, also
> accessible from the site navigation itself. As you can see, there is
> plenty of info to be added. I think the intro is woefully inadequate,
> and somebody needs to f
Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
I requested bala to implement this before releasing it to public.
Thats main reason behind the delay.
Okay, but I find that strange, given that we were still debating static
pages or wiki. Last I know, some of us continued to make arguments in
favor of the stati
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Bharathi
Subramanian wrote:
> This time, wiki is not open by default. If anyone wants to create
> login will have to send a req mail and links to discussion that they
> have participated in ilugc mailing list. All commits will be protected
> by captcha.
Send mail t
Hi Bharathi,
--- On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Bharathi
Subramanian wrote:
| I requested bala to implement this before releasing it to public.
| Thats main reason behind the delay.
\--
In future, can we keep all discussions to the list? It helps to know the status.
Thanks!
SK
--
Shakthi K
On 10:54am, Vamsee Kanakala wrote:
> Hmm. I don't understand. So why are we even having these long
> discussions about the site? What's the way forward? I didn't see any
> updates on what's happening on ilugc.in after I reported that it's
> been down a few days ago, and it now sports a couple of s
Hi,
--- On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Shrinivasan
T wrote:
| Bala may be busy with his schedules as all of us do.
\--
That is exactly what we are trying to solve here! I appreciate Bala's
efforts, but, it will be good for more Maintainers to help the site,
when either one of us are busy!
---
Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
I'm not sure about the status of ilugc.in, because Balachander seems
to have put a static page too (which I copied some content and layout
from, thanks :). He hasn't clarified yet on the status of the
domain, > and going by the footer of that site, I'm assuming h
Shrinivasan T wrote:
As there are too many opinions about the site,
I think he is trying some of them and will give us a better one.
I'm sorry if I'm coming across as pushy on this one - I wasn't shy to
admit that I was on vacation, and the updates to a discussion thread
might come slow. M
Hi,
Bala may be busy with his schedules as all of us do.
Even, he is ready to share his time and skill for ilugc.in
As there are too many opinions about the site,
I think he is trying some of them and will give us a better one.
Nice to see that more people are interested in our site.
Waiting to
Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
ilugc.in is a community site. Bala is registered it for ILUGC and he
assured that it will remain as community site. Plz don't make
parallel sites for ilugc.
Hmm. I don't understand. So why are we even having these long
discussions about the site? What's the way forw
> I'm not sure about the status of ilugc.in, because Balachander seems
> to have put a static page too (which I copied some content and layout
> from, thanks :). He hasn't clarified yet on the status of the
domain, > and going by the footer of that site, I'm assuming he
wants to keep it
> for himse
Hi all,
I've had some free time yesterday, and was able to setup a basic
structure for ilugc.org. Right now, all the other domains, ilugc.com,
ilugc.net and ilugc.info should redirect to www.ilugc.org.
I'm not sure about the status of ilugc.in, because Balachander seems to
have put a static
13 matches
Mail list logo
