[Ietf-dkim] Re: Forwarding, was Review: draft-gondwana-dkim2-motivation-01

On Sat, Mar 15, 2025, 1:50 p.m. Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Wed 12/Mar/2025 15:51:44 +0100 Allen Robinson wrote: > >> Definition of forwarding > > > > In the context of DKIM2, this is the act of accepting a message with > some > > 821.To address and resending it to some number of other 821.To >

[Ietf-dkim] Re: comments on draft-gondwana-dkim2-motivation

Re: signature numbering. On 3/6/25 4:06 PM, Allen Robinson wrote: It invalidates the originating signature though (actually all of the previous with different rcpt-to). This seems at odds "mutation" goal too. The signatures form a chain. The recipient address of one signature is e

[Ietf-dkim] Re: comments on draft-gondwana-dkim2-motivation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message , Michael Thomas writes >Ok, I think I might be getting it. So the inclusion of the mf= and >rt= is basically signaling to the receiver that the signer wants to >limit the scope of what sort of forwarding it finds acceptable.

[Ietf-dkim] Re: comments on draft-gondwana-dkim2-motivation

On 3/6/25 4:06 PM, Allen Robinson wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, 5:56 p.m. Michael Thomas wrote: 1. I craft some spam and I test it across a range of anti-spam filters (or just gmail's) and voila, I find one that will pass their filters 2. I then take that message and send it to my list of r

[Ietf-dkim] Review of draft-gondwana-dkim2-modification-alegbra-01

Review of draft-gondwana-dkim2-modification-alegbra-01 Overall: I'm very supportive of the direction of this draft, which is to describe mutations in messages as it traverses forwarders, with the intent to be able