This is at least the third posting from someone resorting to appeal to
authority as a reason for discounting alternatives.
I mean, gosh, smart people thought about this for months. So no one
else could possibly come up with better choices.
Not exactly conducive to healthy working group proce
On 1/25/2025 4:00 PM, Richard Clayton wrote:
the notion of giving the sender the task of deciding on which headers to
sign and then adding headers in twice to avoid non-RFC compliant
messages being erroneously accepted is exotic
Except it isn't. Flexibility is not exotic. Adaptability is not
On 1/28/2025 7:29 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I've uploaded the discussed changes to the charter,
Core advocates of this effort are thoroughly committed to the details of
their draft document.
And they have been consistently hostile to proposals for alternative
details, either ignoring t
On 2/1/25 12:56 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 1/25/2025 4:00 PM, Richard Clayton wrote:
... the notion
that allowing a choice of relaxed or simple for bodies means that people
have to engineer for both -- that's exotic
Right. Everyone must use ASCII, because allowing Unicode would be
exotic.
