Dave
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 7:15 PM Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 11/21/2024 1:21 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> I have made a second pass at it. Text below, or see the raw copy at:
>
> https://notes.ietf.org/YGynIPpYS7yqg5G7ZeSQeA
>
>
> Summary:
>
>- As provided, this is an extremely broad and
Hiya,
I read the proposed charter and briefly scanned the I-D [1].
I support going forward and creating a WG on that basis.
I disagree with some things in [1] but those can be handled
later. (And no, I don't have a written-down list now:-)
I do not think this proposed work is research nor oug
Hi all - it looks like no other responses all week! I'm going to merge your
ideas.
Given there are no other comments - Murray, are we ready to take this to IESG?
Updates still at:
https://notes.ietf.org/YGynIPpYS7yqg5G7ZeSQeA
And I've posted the whole thing at the end...
>> DKIM gives us a w
I have some thoughts on this issue, but am holding off on commenting
until the charter is settled.
-Jim
On 27 Nov 2024, at 13:30, Bron Gondwana wrote:
I posted an updated draft for this last week with the 'z=y' case for
"complex irreversible change".
I am interested (yes, I know - technical
I like the new charter and think it effectively addresses the comments received
so far.
The one question I have would be whether or not the charter should explicitly
call out the coordination of one or more interoperability events as
deliverables... or would those activities be assumed given t
I posted an updated draft for this last week with the 'z=y' case for "complex
irreversible change".
I am interested (yes, I know - technical questions before chartered) in how
people feel about a line-based copy format rather than just the character based
one. I'm thinking that because the mo
On 11/21/2024 1:21 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
I have made a second pass at it. Text below, or see the raw copy at:
https://notes.ietf.org/YGynIPpYS7yqg5G7ZeSQeA
Summary:
* As provided, this is an extremely broad and extremely vague
statement of work. It continues to sound far more appropr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message <64e2e0bf-40a2-4c8a-ad0b-6a6fe0bab...@dcrocker.net>, Dave
Crocker writes
>Given the considerable increase of scope for DKIM and range of
>topics cited here for improvement, the charter should have a
>concrete proposal to take
Bron,
I read with interest the proposal published at
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gondwana-dkim2-motivation-01.html
I think it could contribute to the development, with all due respect to
DKIM technology, the core approach already deserves it. But there are a
few points that should be mention
