Hiya,

I read the proposed charter and briefly scanned the I-D [1].

I support going forward and creating a WG on that basis.

I disagree with some things in [1] but those can be handled
later. (And no, I don't have a written-down list now:-)

I do not think this proposed work is research nor ought it
be related to the IRTF in any shape or form.

I think the proponents would be wise to be more visibly open
to serious consideration of (even randomer) IETF input. They
will inevitably get that, and ISTM a "fingers-in-the-ears-
unless-X' approach is tactically unwise, as there are always
people smart enough to re-cast their input as being related
to X, for any X.

Cheers,
S.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gondwana-dkim2-motivation-01.html

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to