Laura,
Appreciate all the work and effort you’ve put into this. I would like to help
out as much as I can. I know Monitoring isn’t part of this from IETF POV,
however, I think it’s something that is important and I will bring this up on
the M3AAWG side.
I am happy to share on the thing we ha
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:03 PM Wei Chuang wrote:
> I was there at M3AAWG and concur with the chair's observations. I should
> also note I was part of the group who proposed restarting the DKIM WG at
> Dispatch IETF-115. My hope back then was that solving DKIM replay
> systematically could be
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 6:33 AM
wrote:
> Appreciate all the work and effort you’ve put into this. I would like to
> help out as much as I can. I know Monitoring isn’t part of this from IETF
> POV, however, I think it’s something that is important and I will bring
> this up on the M3AAWG side.
>
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 1:50 AM Jan Dušátko
wrote:
> I would like to ask to consider the possibility of defining a DKIM
> signature using Ed448. [...]
Which DKIM implementations are known to be willing to support this if it
were added?
ED25519 support was added by a working group called DCRUP.
On 27/10/2023 15:56, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Which DKIM implementations are known to be willing to support this if it
were added?
If I saw interest, I'd be willing to add it to Exim.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.or
On October 27, 2023 2:56:30 PM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy"
wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 1:50 AM Jan Dušátko
>wrote:
>
>> I would like to ask to consider the possibility of defining a DKIM
>> signature using Ed448. [...]
>
>
>Which DKIM implementations are known to be willing to support this i
It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>On October 27, 2023 2:56:30 PM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy"
> wrote:
>>On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 1:50 AM Jan Dušátko
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to ask to consider the possibility of defining a DKIM
>>> signature using Ed448. [...]
>My view is that more encry
