On 4/8/2025 4:33 PM, Richard Clayton wrote:
The WG is chartered to determine what issues DKIM2 is going to
address,
Richard,
My reading of the charter concludes that the charter already specifies
explicitly what issues will be addressed.
What it leaves open -- albeit with guidance abo
On 4/8/2025 5:43 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Sun 06/Apr/2025 20:56:35 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote:
...
The semantics of the new effort really are orthogonal to DKIM. (And
that is one of the reaon the technical errors in the Motivation draft
demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding, rather t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
#1 draft-gondwana-dkim2-motivation
The WG is chartered to determine what issues DKIM2 is going to
address, and this is a good starting point for that discussion and
so in my view it should be adopted for that purpose.
I think it's un
On Sun 06/Apr/2025 20:56:35 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote:
The goals for the new effort are for a very different set of services. There
is nothing wrong with wanting those services, but really, they are not DKIM.
The semantics of the new effort really are orthogonal to DKIM. (And that is
one of t
