"vinton g. cerf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 01:01 PM 12/9/2003 +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
> >What is wrong with ISOC?
> at the moment it is not well constituted to develop policy.
This is a feature, not a bug.
--
Mark Atwood | When you do things right,
[EMA
John Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Correct. Lets get an application name space so we don't need to worry
> about it.
>
Please gods below, not more ASN.1
--
Mark Atwood |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
ll required to investigate. Makes sense to me.
If it's so routine, why is it so redacted?
--
Mark Atwood |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
om being clueless, politicised, wholely
owned, misguided, heavyhanded, and often criminal.
--
Mark Atwood |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
e.
Even if you educate the agent you are talking to, he has peers and
superiours who are clueless and looking for "points".
The ONLY ONLY ONLY thing you ever say to a LEO is "no" and "speak to
my lawyer".
--
Mark Atwood |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
> http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?&pn=US05443036__
My cat and I were given a laser pen as a joint present a few years
back, to do this very thing. This is like granting a patent for using
a hammer to crack nuts instead of drive nails.
--
Mark Atwood |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Is there such a thing for IPv6?
>
> (like the 192.168.x.x and 172.10.x.x) in IPv4?
>
There's the link local and site local addresses.
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just
s to say,
and show up at the meetings.
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| might. <http://www.friesian.com/rifkin.htm>
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
; from unsolicited commercial email by
> indicating so in the SMTP banner.
Rescap Profile for Mail User Agents
draft-hoffman-rescap-mua-02.txt
November 20, 1999
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't
uch "mediation" is unnecessary.
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| might. <http://www.friesian.com/rifkin.htm>
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
r winnings, sir. (Thank
you.))
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| might. <http://www.friesian.com/rifkin.htm>
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
a matter guaranteed to give ulcers and headaches
to every firewall admin on the `net.
Netmeeting? *spit* I used it for a year to "video telecommute".
--
Mark Atwood | Freedom from want, freedom from fear, freedom from choice.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Is that the freedom you want?
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
feel
my eyelids start to get heavy. Too many sales and PHB presentations,
probably.)
--
Mark Atwood | Freedom from want, freedom from fear, freedom from choice.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Is that the freedom you want?
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
ISTR reading an RFC or ID awhile back about using multicast to
distribute files to many hosts from a central server via
multicast. But I'm having no luck today with the search engines, and
can't find it again.
Can anyone post a pointer?
--
Mark Atwood | I'm wearing black on
al of respect for someone who can
build from scratch an ISP in that environment, it is very different
and very challanging compared to yet-another-huge-dialup ISP.
The Cisco guy should not get any cred jsut because of the corporation
name on his business card.
--
Mark Atwood | I'm w
Politician's Fallacy ("we
must do something, this is something, therefore we must do this.")
--
Mark Atwood | Well done is better than well said.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
become a "must have" feature, and then
eventually the link configuration will be re-engineered and
"inverted", with IP taking it's rightful place at the "true" layer 3.
--
Mark Atwood | Well done is better than well said.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
.epub has a number of serious faults of its own, that are starting to be
experienced as people are playing with it in wake of the iPad stuff. It's
basically a dead end repackaging of an old HTML spec, and it has nobody
working on getting it up to date, or working on it at all.
On Thu, Mar 11, 201
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Greg Daley wrote:
>
> I would actually not encourage IETF to work on such a technology as this,
> particularly in the lead-up to IETF Beijing. That would be a serious
> affront
> to our hosts.
By "as this", you are referring to both technologies such as "Tor",
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> On 2010-3-27, at 13:41, Ray Pelletier wrote:
> > We have been working with an online vendor to allow t-shirts and other
> > paraphernalia (coffee mugs, ball caps, etc)
> > to be purchased. The "rock concert" design has been a particular
> >
Much of what makes the IETF work is how it is very different from other
standards bodies (such as IEEE, ANSI, ISO, NIST, ITU, etc etc).
One key difference is that "groups" do not join the IETF.
Cisco, IBM, MCI, or Linden Lab are not a "members" of the IETF. No agency
of the US government, or of
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Stephan Wenger wrote:
>
> Hi Fred,
>>
>
> Would you really expect me not to throw my weight (assuming there were
>> one) behind the proposal I fought teeth and claws before—and damage my
>> relationship with my n
> As far as using certificates --- sure, it's possible to set up EAP-TLS
> using client certificates. It can be done on Mac, Windows, and Linux.
> But the setup of that across multiple operating systems and getting
> users to correctly set up their certificates, sending a CA signing
> request secu
This post would be much less confusing if you would name names, cite
examples, and point fingers.
> The reason why so many documents are at proposed is that they're
> often collections of bloat (limited-use features with an aggresive
> requirements level) from various interest groups that is
> not
ere users and upstarts can only call connect().
Some people consider that a feature. I do not.
It is, in fact, getting really hard to avoid assuming malice on the
part of people who want to nail the world to the nat44 cross.
.. Mark Atwood
___
Ietf mail
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>
> Fascinating. I had no idea that there even *was* such a phrase in common
> usage, let alone that there was known etymology for it. One learns something
> new every day.
> But I meant it quite literally: a moderate/humble/etc. proposal
Hello.
I would like to express my concern about retiring the xx99 RFCs. I
think they still fill a need, especially over longer periods of time,
and should not be discontinued.
It was stated that they are no longer needed because "up to date
information" is available online, and the RFC search en
27 matches
Mail list logo
