Brian Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Pardon me but, horse hocky! We are not talking about objecting to the > laws but rather how the FBI reacted to a report of a crime. Even tho' > they were pretty sure that they had been handed a red herring they were > still required to investigate. Makes sense to me. If it's so routine, why is it so redacted? -- Mark Atwood | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
- Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason) Dr. Jai Maharaj
- Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Tr... Brian Lloyd
- Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Tr... Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (Fo... Mark Atwood
- Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (Fo... Mark Atwood
- Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation... Jim Thompson
- Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (Fo... Fred Baker