Hi,
in John's formulation, the process work of the general area withers
away - or at least moves to a different corner of the world.
so what happens to the general area?
one suggestion is to axe it.
my suggestion would be for that role to be staffed by a generalist who
is comfortable with co
well said. neither am i.
a.
On 6 okt 2005, at 13.42, Bill Manning wrote:
i for one, am not in favor of a PR action against anyone.
--bill
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 7 okt 2005, at 17.56, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
It's just possible that the threshold might be higher for some
than it is for others.
So which threshold is the "right" threshold?
I think that the offense has to be so egregious that invoking such
draconian rules is truly a roug
Hi,
I think there needs to be some mention of requirements such as:
- MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are so
stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely difficult for
some participant to attend.
- MUST NOT be held in a country with restrictions on freedom of
On 14 okt 2005, at 13.19, Jari Arkko wrote:
Freedom of expression is another matter, and would be slippery
slope indeed. I think in most cases we would be better off
being open and constructive, and helping more people understand
what our views are than to refuse contact.
I agree, and that
recommendations.
a.
On 14 okt 2005, at 15.39, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 11:58, Avri Doria wrote:
I think there needs to be some mention of requirements such as:
- MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are so
stringent as to make it impossible or even
ted by the community.
a.
On 17 okt 2005, at 05.59, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Avri" == Avri Doria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Avri> - MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are
Avri> so stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely
Avri> diffi
these issues be a formal requirement of the
community's decision in where we meet. And that they be taken
seriously.
a.
On 17 okt 2005, at 21.50, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote:
"Avri" == Avri Doria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Avri> - MUST NOT be
On 29 okt 2005, at 15.40, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Amorality among scientists, engineers, and technologists has
gotten the
world into a lot of trouble. I prefer to think about the
consequences
of what I do.
I think we all do, and I think it's one of the reasons why I felt
Jefs
On 29 okt 2005, at 23.09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Saddam had WMD, but he used them all up
on the Kurds. Darn those Kurds anyway.
were these the left over from the ones the US gave him for the war
with Iran?
a.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf
sorry. wrong list in address.
a.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 5 nov 2005, at 02.59, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
The advantage of PDF is that it preserves the exact appearance of the
original document, and that it is designed to be a final format, that
is, it is not designed to be editable (and editing PDF is difficult,
deliberately so). Also, PDF read
On 11 nov 2005, at 13.56, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
In 19 days, this very hotel and meeting rooms will be filled with
ICANN
attendees, most of whom are not "technical" in our sense of the
word. That
should be lots of fun :-)
It will be interesting to see if ICANN has as much trouble, or IEEE
On 15 nov 2005, at 16.43, Dondeti, Lakshminath wrote:Hi Eliot, The most recent number of nomcom eligible folks is 849, please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/show_nomcom_message.cgi?id=446. 20 people out of that isn't all that high. I think I might easily find 10 like-minded people; but
On 11 jul 2006, at 09.07, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
This was NOT intended for general distribution - my apologies...
perhaps, but the timely transparency was refreshing.
thanks for the error.
a.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ie
Hi,
I do not wish to enter the substance of this appeal for i am
qualified neither by position nor training to adjudicate on the
justice of an appeal.
But I do want to question one paragraph that has been published on
behalf of the leadership of this organization. This questioning is
n
Hi,
I think I am somewhat confused by this discussion.
In one place you say:
On 14 jul 2006, at 11.04, Fred Baker wrote:
The IETF should indeed meet where our participants come from. That
was my initial comment (from the mike) on "are we from Latin
America, Africa, or Antarctica?" I think
On 2 sep 2006, at 14.49, John C Klensin wrote:
I assume that everything have been done
with good faith here but, to paraphrase an off-list discussion,
at least some of the community will always have a nagging fear
that the reset was motivated by some members of the community
believing that a se
Hi,
To add a tidbit. There has long been a notion of an umbrella of
confidentiality in Nomcom. Which means that anyone who has, or is
given access, to any of the confidential information has to agree to
keep the information confidential. While I have paid very little
attention t nomcom
Hi,
As several people have pointed out, we are having problems with the
Edu site. I thank everyone who has reported it and wanted to let
people know two things:
- we are looking into the problem and will get it fixed as soon as
possible
- as soon as those who gave today's talks give me
Hi,
the Edu Team web page (edu.ietf.org) has now been fixed and the
presentations can be found both there and on the Agenda page.
thanks for your patience.
a.
On 18 mar 2007, at 20.17, Avri Doria wrote:
Hi,
As several people have pointed out, we are having problems with the
Edu site
On 16 dec 2007, at 15.15, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
I've attended meetings where we had a "closed laptop" policy during
presentations,
i find those authoritarian and repressive. unless there is complete
unanimity in the room for such a policy it is a very bad idea.
incidentally, i always feel
hi,
Yes, the database was moved to a new system and then broke. After
some effort James Seng, who is kind enough to host this site has fixed
it. I have tested it somewhat and added the XML tutorial. I will add
the rest of the tutorial from IETF70 as soon as I can.
Please let me know i
this was becasue the MPLS area was there. As it is
a management protocol for sub-ip entities I think the best alternate
placement for it is the management area. I obviously support it
remaining in the permanent Sub-IP area should that be an option.
a.
--
Avri Doria
http://www.sm.luth.se/~avri/
nvironment.
1330-1500 Editor's Training -- Conrad C (Avri Doria)
Training for current or aspiring IETF document
editors. Covers the roles and responsibilities
of a document editor, and includes advice on
producing a high-quality IETF specification.
1330-1500 Intro WG
. Yakov Rekhter
71. Glenn Zorn72. Rodney Thayer
Chair, NomCom
---
avri doria
+1 617 678 9402
Hi,
While I find the idea of actually tracking experimentals rather inviting, I do
think the overhead of such a process should definitely be part of the
consideration.
I find the idea of knowing when an experiment its over, challenging. For
example, I am working on an experimental, albeit a
Hi,
In reading this thread several thoughts have come to mind:
- for several years I have not been able to attend an IETF mtg in person, yet
always join in some of the sessions remotely. Is our remote attendance recorded
as well, or its it only in the chat archive? I have noticed that not all
Hi,
In reading this thread several thoughts have come to mind:
- for several years I have not been able to attend an IETF mtg in person, yet
always join in some of the sessions remotely. Is our remote attendance recorded
as well, or its it only in the chat archive? I have noticed that not all
Hi,
It may not be line a hiring manager, but all those who have budget can make it
a point to make sure some of the younger engineers get to some of the meetings,
at least the ones that are relatively local to them. I assume that many of the
older participants, have the means to influence the
Hi,
I think this is an excellent draft and have already sent a pointer of it to
colleagues in other organizations as stuff to consider.
And although it has been eons since I chaired anything in the IETF, it
perfectly matches my recollection of what humming and rough consensus was all
about.
31 matches
Mail list logo
