infocom 2000 had 2 sessions (8 papers) from the main people - check
out their web site (papers are online..ia ieee)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Barbara Bao typed:
>>Dear Friends,
>>
>>For my assignment, I need to know algorithms for discovering layer-3 and
>>layer-2 network topology. Whe
In looking in multimedia-related patents, I'm also utterly amazed by the
complete lack of citation of published technical articles or related
work (RFCs, Internet drafts, etc.). The problem with many patents is
that if submitted as a technical paper at even the lowliest conference,
it would be lau
In recent years, IEEE Infocom (www.ieee-infocom.org) and the spring IETF
meeting have clashed repeatedly, including this year. IEEE Infocom is
scheduled several years in advance (through 2004 at this point), so it
is easy to avoid. I've brought up the topic in the past, but was told
that the numbe
Note: forwarded message attached.
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Casey Farrell; Designer[EMAIL PROTECTED] This Letter and All Contents Copyright 1999 Casey F
>>My thought is this: I'd like to see a presumption of lack of novelty if an
>>idea gets raised in a public forum, even if it happens _after_ a patent has
>>been applied for, unless it can be shown that the information came from
>>leakage of proprietary information.
intersting idea
i w
> From: Jon Crowcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
> perhaps the length of patent protection should be directly related to
> the cost of developing an idea - in pharmaceutical industry, long
> patents make sense because of the large investment in testing a new
> drug safely - similar i nthe automot
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, James P. Salsman wrote:
> The proposal would involve ammending the registration of the
> text/html media type, incorporating the W3C standards extended with
> two attributes of the INPUT element, DEVICE and MAXTIME.
Last time I checked, IANA, and not the IETF, controls the d
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 1 15:25:32 2000
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 02:25:06 +0300 (EEST)
From: Stephanos Piperoglou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James P. Salsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML forms
On Thu, 30
> Last time I checked, IANA, and not the IETF, controls the definitions
> of Media Types.
yes, but IANA follows IETF rules in assignment and updating of media types.
> The entry for text/html [1] says, simply "See RFC
> 1866". And RFC 1866 [2] is a more or less verbatim copy of the HTML
> 2.0 S
Stephanos,
Thanks for your message:
>... You need detailed definitions, changes to DTDs, and more.
> If you have these details, it would be nice to point us all to a
> proposal so we know how "DEVICE" and "MAXTIME" would work.
Sorry about not pointing to this document:
http://www.bovik.org/d
Keith,
Thanks for your message:
> the problem as I see it is that Mr. Salsman has not been able to obtain
> much community support, much less consensus, for his idea. I am
> not so sure that it's a fundamentally bad idea, but perhaps it needs
> tweaking in order to gain widespread support.
Can anyone help me find documentation of a hacker attack that includes
details of the attack and what was done to prevent similar attacks in
the future? Respectfully, Betsy B.
Keith Moore wrote:
> Note that since IETF does acknowledge W3C as the "owner" of the HTML
> specifications
...much as the ITU acknowledges the IETF as the "owner" of the
IP specifications. Let's not set a precedent we can't live with. :-)
--
/==
James,
bottom line is, this is a W3C matter. you need to convince *them*.
Keith
> If there needs to be a formal proposal to the IETF, it should
> not be submitted by me alone. Experience has shown that an
> outspoken geek with no apparent interest is not taken as
> seriously as would be, for example, the officers in charge of
> teaching spoken languages to cadets at West Poi
Dear Dr. Berners-Lee,
Thanks for your message:
> Rather than trying to change The HTML specification, one needs to
> encourage this feature to be implemented, and implemented well.
I completely agree with that end goal, whether the means involve
extending HTML or not.
> Ways to do this inclu
16 matches
Mail list logo
