Keith Moore wrote: > Note that since IETF does acknowledge W3C as the "owner" of the HTML > specifications ...much as the ITU acknowledges the IETF as the "owner" of the IP specifications. Let's not set a precedent we can't live with. :-) -- /=================================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |================================================| |eCal Corp. |When rats leave a sinking ship, where exactly do| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|they think they're going? | \=================================================================/
- Re: HTML forms Salvador Vidal
- Re: HTML forms James P. Salsman
- Re: HTML forms Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: Standards development (was HTML form... Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Standards development (was HTML ... Walter Ian Kaye
- Re: Standards development (was ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: Standards development (was HTML ... James P. Salsman
- Re: HTML forms Stephanos Piperoglou
- Re: HTML forms James P. Salsman
- Re: HTML forms Keith Moore
- ACCEPT and DEVICE (was Re: HTML form... John Stracke
- ACCEPT and DEVICE (was Re: HTML forms) James P. Salsman
- Privacy & law Salvador Vidal
- Re: Privacy & law Martin Montenegro
- Re: HTML forms James Salsman
- Re: HTML forms James P. Salsman
- Re: HTML forms Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: HTML forms James P. Salsman
- Re: HTML forms James P. Salsman
- Re: HTML forms James P. Salsman
- Re: HTML forms jty202Yahoo