On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Interesting stuff, but more on-topic for the perpass list:
>
> I think Deans point is precisely that it is _not_ a topic that can be
> restricted to the perpass list.
>
>
Yes and yes. E
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Interesting stuff, but more on-topic for the perpass list:
I think Deans point is precisely that it is _not_ a topic that can be
restricted to the perpass list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/29/13 11:17 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
>
> importance of including anti-surveillance features as mandatory
> aspects of our protocols.
Interesting stuff, but more on-topic for the perpass list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
Peter
Some of you may recall me ranting several years ago about the importance of
including anti-surveillance features as mandatory aspects of our protocols.
I seem to recall getting (mostly) politely laughed at ...
Anyhow, there's an article on the topic in Wired right now that hints at
the commercial
