On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: > > Interesting stuff, but more on-topic for the perpass list: > > I think Deans point is precisely that it is _not_ a topic that can be > restricted to the perpass list. > > Yes and yes. Every protocol needs privacy considerations, and such considerations SHOULD be discussed in every WG. But we also need a place where we can talk about them in general, and that's perpass. One of the major points a WG should ensure is that a protocol does not _limit_ the privacy possibilities in the environment it is part of. That's not easy, but see RFC 6973 for a start. Scott
