I agree with you SM, politics and considering countries names in that
way, that is out of scope of IETF. Comments below,
AB
On 9/8/13, SM wrote:
> At 07:07 08-09-2013, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>You mean like Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Syria, Saudi Arabia
>
> There were people from Pakistan who part
On 9/8/13 4:36 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> At 11:59 08-09-2013, joel jaeggli wrote:
>> Should your tools, the contents of your mind, and the various effects
>> and context of your personal communication become instruments of
>> state-power? Because the tools we've built are certainly capable of that
Hi Joel,
At 11:59 08-09-2013, joel jaeggli wrote:
Should your tools, the contents of your mind, and the various effects
and context of your personal communication become instruments of
state-power? Because the tools we've built are certainly capable of that.
Yes. That's not a good motivation t
ietf-boun...@ietf.org wrote on 09/08/2013 08:14:07 AM:
> From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
>
> Another worrying aspect of BULLRUN is that it is named after a
> victory for the confederate side in the US civil war.
But the battles are only called the (First or Second) Battle of Bull Run
by the NORTH
On 09/09/2013 03:03, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>
>> Probably best if we keep the politics off the IETF list.
>>
>> Noel
>>
>
> I grew up in politics. There is a method to my approach here.
Nevertheless, it is the wrong method here.
On 9/8/13 10:37 AM, SM wrote:
> At 07:07 08-09-2013, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> You mean like Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Syria, Saudi Arabia
>
> There were people from Pakistan who participated in the IETF. I recall
> an email exchange where a person from that country received an
> unpleasant commen
At 07:07 08-09-2013, Jorge Amodio wrote:
You mean like Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Syria, Saudi Arabia
There were people from Pakistan who participated in the IETF. I
recall an email exchange where a person from that country received an
unpleasant comment from someone who is part of the IETF
On Sunday, September 08, 2013 11:13:44 Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
...
> might be the type of people who put confederate flags on their cars.
...
Since Bull Run is the Union name for the battle, probably not (It'd have been
Manassas from a Confederate perspective).
Scott K
P. S. We are rathe
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
> >The other countries concerned did not employ torture as the US did under
> President Bush.
>
> You mean like Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Syria, Saudi Arabia
>
My original comment was limited to adversaries with potential intercept
capabil
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> Probably best if we keep the politics off the IETF list.
>
> Noel
>
I grew up in politics. There is a method to my approach here.
I know that the IETF list is watched. I am making it clear that I am a
personal political opponent of C
Probably best if we keep the politics off the IETF list.
Noel
>The other countries concerned did not employ torture as the US did under
President Bush.
You mean like Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Syria, Saudi Arabia
-J
>provided by the Fourth Amendment applies only to US citizens and not
>to EU citizens or other non-US citizens;"
>
> There aren't any villains in all this. There is a question of whether the
> company taking the data will value each of its customers equably when it
as EU citizens; whereas, for instance, the protection
provided by the Fourth Amendment applies only to US citizens and not
to EU citizens or other non-US citizens;"
There aren't any villains in all this. There is a question of
whether the company taking the data will value each
14 matches
Mail list logo
