nt to carefully distinguish between these sorts of
> redirection. Some clarifying text in the draft to this effect would
> be helpful.
I agree that this is important, as well.
Patrik Fältström said
> I have no problem whatsoever to have proxies being part of the
> web-model, but I am
See the http://www.w3c.org/Mobile Web site.
ssh
"Manohar
Actually, I think this is the case more often than many people may realize.
Right now, for example, one of my sites is running in this mode for exactly
this reason. Yes, there are issues, but not ones that aren't relatively
easily mitigated.
ssh
--
Steve Hultquist, CTO and VP of Techn
While it is important to focus on building protocols that are as functional as possible in as many different environments as possible, I find the statement that protocols are "functionally deficient" that do not take NAT and firewalls into account to be misguided. The ultimate goal of a network,
you argue that such a transition isn't possible? It's much easier than (say) migrating operating systems.
ssh
--
Steve Hultquist, CTO and VP of Technology
Leopard
Boulder, Colorado, http://www.leopard.com/
"Tony Hain (Exchange)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11
that the implications are now becoming more clear to so many.
ssh
Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/29/99 04:06 PM
To: Steve Hultquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Pete Loshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Many of the people who have deployed NATs are responding directly to the
address scarcity (and resultant cost). If you consider that many ISPs now
have different pricing models for multiple IP addresses than they do for a
single (regardless of bandwidth used), it isn't surprising. I also think
th
