Re: [icinga-users] Requiring multiple successful plugin runs to return to OK state?

2018-07-10 Thread Assaf Flatto
On 10/07/18 19:55, Edgar Fuß wrote: In order to move to a hard non-ok state, a service can require multiple (i.e. max_check_attempts) unsuccessful runs of the check plugin. Is there a way to require multiple successful plugin runs in order to return to a (hard) ok state? I have printers where,

Re: [icinga-users] Requiring multiple successful plugin runs to return to OK state?

2018-07-10 Thread Wolfgang
Looking at the Icinga 1.x documentation ("5.8.4 Hard states", https://www.icinga.com/docs/icinga1/latest/en/statetypes.html#hardstates) it says: Hard states occur for hosts and services in the following situations: * When a host or service check results in a non-UP or non-OK state and

Re: [icinga-users] Distributed Monitoring for Client Host cluster-zone command question

2018-07-10 Thread Rick Liu
So you are using separate cluster-zone service check? What are you using for the host check? Rick From: icinga-users on behalf of mustafa mujahid Sent: July 10, 2018 7:16 AM To: Icinga User's Corner Subject: Re: [icinga-users] Distributed Monitoring for Cli

[icinga-users] Requiring multiple successful plugin runs to return to OK state?

2018-07-10 Thread Edgar Fuß
In order to move to a hard non-ok state, a service can require multiple (i.e. max_check_attempts) unsuccessful runs of the check plugin. Is there a way to require multiple successful plugin runs in order to return to a (hard) ok state? I have printers where, if toner is low (not empty), from time

Re: [icinga-users] Distributed Monitoring for Client Host cluster-zone command question

2018-07-10 Thread mustafa mujahid
This is a valid question to which I was also looking for the answer. If the zone disconnects then only the cluster zone service fails. When it should trigger the RED for all services in that zone. It doesn’t happen. I guess dependency checks can be used but I’m not sure. BR/Mustafa. Sent from