Re: [icinga-users] pnp4nagios graph issues

Hi, seems that your check command provides no performance data, so PNP didn't ever get any related values. Therefore it never created the file mentioned your the error message. Newer versions of the Icinga Web 2 PNP module implement an additional check for existence of those files, so you wouldn't

Re: [icinga-users] Encrypted constans

Jenkins and TeamCity continuous build servers support something simillar. The encrypted variables can be accessed as environment variables. If there is a user interface to edit service checks that is shared, misc people in different roles can use the password as a variable but not be able to see i

[icinga-users] How to exclude some interfaces in a service check with apply - for

Hello, all. To monitor network switches, I have some host configurations set up as below. This approach is successful in providing the service checks for each interface as expected, but there are a few interfaces that I want to exclude from a service check because the OID is invalid (IE, no input

Re: [icinga-users] Disable pnp4nagios integration for a single service

> On 01 Dec 2015, at 17:56, Markus Joosten wrote: > > Also, i'd set the action_url to "", so that no link to pnp4nagios will be > created within Icingaweb2. The PNP module does not need any action_url object attribute, it will determine the graphs to present on its own (awesome feature by Tom

Re: [icinga-users] Encrypted constans

> On 01 Dec 2015, at 18:01, Dominik Zalewski wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering if there are any plans to support encrypted constants. > > Basically I have a SQL server password that I would like to store encrypted > in constans.conf and it use for some checks. Depends if the encryption as a co

[icinga-users] Encrypted constans

Hi, I was wondering if there are any plans to support encrypted constants. Basically I have a SQL server password that I would like to store encrypted in constans.conf and it use for some checks. Thanks Dominik ___ icinga-users mailing list icinga-use

Re: [icinga-users] Disable pnp4nagios integration for a single service

Also, i'd set the action_url to "", so that no link to pnp4nagios will be created within Icingaweb2. Regards, Markus Sent from my iPhone On 01 Dec 2015, at 16:20, Michael Friedrich mailto:michael.friedr...@netways.de> > wrote: > On 27 Nov 2015, at 10:26, Marcus Schopen

Re: [icinga-users] Disable pnp4nagios integration for a single service

> On 27 Nov 2015, at 10:26, Marcus Schopen wrote: > > Hi, > > how do I disable pnp4nagios integration into icinga web 2 and > classic-gui web interface for a single service, which doesn't have any > perdata (e.g. like ssl expire checks) so that the interface doesn't links to > graphs > which do

Re: [icinga-users] Icinga HA setup

> On 01 Dec 2015, at 00:24, Markus Joosten wrote: > > I have just wondered about this as well. > > Not having confirmed this myself, I suspect that only the "real" master > actually writes perfdata. The PerfdataWriter feature just receives all check results and their perfdata metrics, even if

Re: [icinga-users] icinga2 web

> On 30 Nov 2015, at 15:50, Osztrovszky Zsolt wrote: > > Hello Guys, > Is it possible to setup Icinga2 Web on a different machine than the Icinga2? > Even more, I’d like to install Icinga2 to a maschine which is behind a VPN > connection. > Can Icinga2 Web communicate with the Core through VPN c

Re: [icinga-users] pushing config from client nodes to master icinga

> On 01 Dec 2015, at 14:26, Jayapandian Ponraj wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been trying to setup an architecture where the configuration of the > nodes/servers is in the servers themselves and then propagated to the master > internally by icinga. I have a few questions in this regard. > > 1) Is th

Re: [icinga-users] Attribute cannot be modified via API

> On 01 Dec 2015, at 13:37, Christian Moreno Moreno > wrote: > > Hi! > > We are testing the new API and I can create new hosts, hostgroups, etc > without problem. But if I try to modify the groups of one host, then I get > one error: > > > curl -k -s -H 'Accept: application/json' -u root:xxx

Re: [icinga-users] Using cluster-zone check for host state

I'm not sure if you need a setup like this if you just have a master and some clients. I'd would also work if you create all your configs (client-hosts/services) in the master zone and then work with command_endpoint. An example might look like this: template Host "default-host-client" {

Re: [icinga-users] Using cluster-zone check for host state

* Per-Henrik Lundblom [151201 13:12]: > Many thanks Reto! I actually got the host state checks working as > desired after moving the client[12] Host object definitions to the > master zone config dir. Had to read Marcus reply four times to really > take it in though... Darn, of course it didn't

[icinga-users] pushing config from client nodes to master icinga

Hi, I have been trying to setup an architecture where the configuration of the nodes/servers is in the servers themselves and then propagated to the master internally by icinga. I have a few questions in this regard. 1) Is there a way to auto accept the config from satellite nodes without running

[icinga-users] "Sent out to any contact" meaning

Hi, Browsing the history notifications in Icingaweb2, I can read "Sent out to any contact". What does this mean? Was that sent to all the contacts? In fact I didn't receive anything. Was that sent to no contact? If it's the case then why? Thanks, Samuel -- Samuel Bancal ENAC-IT EPFL _

[icinga-users] Attribute cannot be modified via API

Hi! We are testing the new API and I can create new hosts, hostgroups, etc without problem. But if I try to modify the groups of one host, then I get one error: curl -k -s -H 'Accept: application/json' -u root:xxx ' https://icinga2-dev-01.ipx:5665/v1/objects/hosts/test15' -X POST -d '{ "templat

Re: [icinga-users] Using cluster-zone check for host state

* Reto Zeder [151201 10:53]: > I do have the same setup in a part of my Network, my setup is a master > -> satellite -> client, all with icinga2. In some cases, satellite is > not able to reach the client, so the only way to do a hostalive check > is with the 'icinga2 node list' command where yo

Re: [icinga-users] Using cluster-zone check for host state

Hi, I do have the same setup in a part of my Network, my setup is a master -> satellite -> client, all with icinga2. In some cases, satellite is not able to reach the client, so the only way to do a hostalive check is with the 'icinga2 node list' command where you can check the last seen time

Re: [icinga-users] Using cluster-zone check for host state

* Markus Joosten [151130 17:48]: > Checks are always executed from an endpoint in the respective zone the > host and service objects are defined in. Haden't realized this, thanks for the clarification. > Therefore you would have to create additional host objects for your > clients in your *mast