We have a position open for an experienced z/OS systems programmer:
https://capps.taleo.net/careersection/304/jobdetail.ftl?job=4018&tz=GMT-06%3A00
Great state benefits, well staffed team and some teleworking permitted (but
must reside locally).
This is not a CICS position even though C
Congratulations and thank you for all the JES3 shops everywhere!
Rebecca
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The OP is referring to a shop that reinstalls z/OS as a way to get to a current
RSU level. In the years in between releases of z/OS, they reorder everything
at a higher maintenance level and then do a complete reinstall.
Has anyone ever heard of this method for putting on maintenance? Can you
You can get by with 1 logical cp on the sandbox but, I would still want 2. For
a development LPAR with Db2, you need the 2 logical CPs. Has it always been
restricted to 1 CP? If not, why was it changed? Everything on that LPAR will
perform better with 2 CPs compared to 1 CP.
---
By any chance do you have your Db2 address spaces in SYSSTC? If yes, get them
moved out AND share give development uses of both logical CPs.
IRLM should be there but the others should. On a 1 CP system, all regular work
stops while a task in SYSSTC is using the CPU. High CPU users like Db2 shou
We use 4 policy names, POLICY#, in round robin fashion. When we get to the
POLICY4 we go back to POLICY1. We also have a process we use for WLM changes
that would allow us to quickly reactivate the policy the way it was before the
last activation.
Keeping back out options available are always
Take a look at FNTS https://www.fnts.com/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Look into using Pivitor, software as a service. It will provide more and better
reports than you probably have today and not use any CPU or use any DASD, and
is very reasonably priced. Plus you will get a yearly review of your system
performance with performance subject matter experts. All you h
Is there any way to recreate the ACS routines source from the SMS ACDS/SCDS?
Anybody ever dealt with missing ACS routines dataset? If so, how did you
recover?
Thanks
Rebecca
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acce
Thank you. Will see if DCOLLECT can help. There is no sign of the dataset in
HSM. The last time we can tell it was used was almost 10 years ago so there is
no telling when it was deleted.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a
Thank you. I will try it.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I went from 1.13 to 2.2 last May without any issue. You probably have already
done this several times, but double check your parmlib members - IEAFIXxx,
IEALPAxx, PROGxx. Any chance you have one that includes modifications of an
exit or module from JES2 1.13? Also, perhaps review any jobs whe
We are having problems using port 1 of our new OSA Express3 T1000 on a z114 (4
ports with 2 PCHID). Running z/OS 1.12. The CHPID is defined as TYPE=OSE.
For both of our two cards that we are trying to also use port 1, D M=CHP(xx)
shows "PATH NOT OPERATIONAL" and "PATH NOT VALIDATED". Port 0
Donald, for LCS we have no VTAM definition only what is in the TCPIP profile.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
FYI - Looks like our hardware vendor has found the answer (I'll know for sure a
bit later on):
After spending a while researching and thinking about the OSA problem, here's
what I think it is.
For the OSE cards, when TCP/IP is started, it uses the information in the
TCP/IP profile to load the p
The changes did not work. We have a copy of that Share document and have
actually read it several times :(
Here is the new definitions from IOCP:
CHPID PATH=(CSS(0),00),SHARED,*
PARTITION=((MVSD,MVSM,MVSP,MVSZ),(=)),PCHID=200,TYPE=OSE
CH
Thank you, Ed. I'll ask the CE about that test. We also have been reading the
implementation guide. The guide and the Share presentation give you a lot of
information and examples for QDIO but not so much for non-QDIO, type OSE.
Thank you Dale. I am going to try that now. Just getting in.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Dale, I replied too soon. After looking further at your recommendation, I
can't do this. The CHPID is type OSE and OSE can not have more than 1 CU.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Please excuse all the replies. I'll go get some coffee now and will report
back after I try the suggestion.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the messa
We have not resolved the problem yet - waiting for change control process. We
do now understand the problem. The problem is because the OSA cards do not
come with a default OAT that includes port 1. To use PORT 1 for LCS you must
use OSA/SF to complete the configuration. There are 2 changes
Yes Chris I did state this wrong "For the OSE cards, when TCP/IP is started, it
uses the information in the TCP/IP profile to load the port with IP address,
etc, that the port needs to connect to the network."
Good thing I am not the communication person here :)
The bottom line (for us) was t
Phoenix Software has BDT now, it is now PHX-BDT. They also have JES3Plus,
which is a simple install and migration from JES3. I did over a weekend and had
no issues. Going to JES3PLUS would allow you to still work on a migration to
JES2 without pressure of being off JES2 before your next z/OS up
Brian,
Could you please share what type of z/OS 2.2 things did not work on the z16?
Thank you,
Rebecca
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
Thank you all for the replies. I didn't know until after I posted that we 2
LPARs on z/OS 2.2 on our existing z16. They have been there for almost a year
now without any issues. We are going to upgrade the z/OS 2.1 systems before
they are migrated to the new z16 later this year. And hope to als
I know z/OS 2.1 and 2.2 are not supported release of z/OS. I also know that the
z16 spec sheet states that z/OS 2.3 is the oldest release of z/OS supported.
But the z16 spec sheet has a 2022 date when z/OS 2.3 was the oldest supported
release. I don't think IBM would list a release of z/OS for
26 matches
Mail list logo
