Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-11 Thread Israel Wagshal
Hi All, I'm installing a software that has to have its own zFS aggregate mounted and available. Looking into the USS filesystem I can see many IBM products' zFS aggregates mounted off /usr/lpp. I can see no foreign aggregate mounted off /usr/lpp. However, /usr/lpp is in IBM's Version root whi

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-11 Thread Israel Wagshal
, without bouncing the system? >On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:51:04 -0500, Israel Wagshal wrote: >> >>I'm installing a software that has to have its own zFS aggregate mounted and >>available. >> >>Looking into the USS filesystem I can see many IBM products'

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Israel Wagshal
; On 11 July 2020, at 15:30, Paul Gilmartin >> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:51:04 -0500, Israel Wagshal wrote: >>> >>> I'm installing a software that has to have its own zFS aggregate mounted &g

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Israel Wagshal
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 05:17:08 -0400, David Spiegel wrote: Yes, of course. The only valid indirect cataloging for PARMLIBs at LOADxx processing time are: 1) ** (six asterisks) 2) *MCAT* (Master Catalog's volume) 3) &SYSRS1 That's because their value is automatically establish

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Israel Wagshal
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 08:54:12 +, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote: Thank you, Gadi. This is what I was missing... >The chmount command can change a file system from Read Only to Read/Write and >back. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /