Hello,
I installed the USI VTA to our customer. The tape drives are attached by a
single shared channel path.
I know BARR ESCON channel's EMIF dose not support, so those tape drives can
only be onlined in one LPAR at one point.
I tried path online with one LPAR (MIF ID:3 partition), but the
Hello,
Thank you for your reply, I tried varying the PATH online.
But the problem was not solved.
Next time, I will try to change the IOCP (added CUADD).
Best regards,
Toyokazu Kobayashi
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Charles"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Friday, Ju
Hello,
A catalog name that does not exist in the VVDS records remains.
Is there a way to remove (or change to the exist catalog name) this?
Best regards,
Toyokazu Kobayashi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
Hello Peter,
Check the OFFLINE setting in IODF's Define Device Parameters.
If the value is "Yes", change to "No".
E Ess HCD Help ssN
sssN
e e e
e
e Command === e Command=>
ea to add these devices in COMMDxx ?
Peter
On Thu, 26 Mar, 2020, 10:22 AM (K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi, <
kobaya...@paradox.jp> wrote:
Hello Peter,
Check the OFFLINE setting in IODF's Define Device Parameters.
If the value is "Yes", change to "No".
E Es
Hello Tony,
Here is GTF trace print JCL:
a) You need to modify it for your environment (DSN, VOLUME, etc...).
b) INPUT DD of the IKJEFT01 step specifies the GTF trace file.
This sample trace file is tape file.
c) The report is output to the JES spool,if you need to report to disk.
Change the
Hello,
I have questions for 3592's hardware compression.
There is a tape where a DFDSS dump was created on a 3592 drive (TS1130) with
the COMPACT feature enabled.
Q1. Can I read this tape on another 3592 drive (such as TS1130 or TS1140)?
Are the 3592 hardware compressions compatible?
Q2. If
- Original Message -
From: "Radoslaw Skorupka"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: 3592 hardware compression
W dniu 22.04.2021 o 16:38, Ed Jaffe pisze:
On 4/22/2021 1:31 AM, (K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi wrote:
There is a tape where a
Hello,
I planing to configure z/OS's native TCP/IP on z10-BC machine.
IOCP DECK is shown at the end of this mail.
The OSA-ICC 3270 sessions are currently configured.
OSE CHPID is defined, but nothing else is configured.
I understand that OSE (Non-QDIO mode) requires UA and port, IP addr, mapping
ri, 10 Sep 2021 17:36:37 +0900, (K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi
wrote:
1) Is the port set in OAT a OSA Physical port?
Yes. If the PCHID has two ports, then you specify port 0 or 1 in the OAT.
But be careful. On a z9, I think you have OSA-Express2. All of the PCHIDs
are single port. There are multipl
Hello,
I will configure z/OS TCP/IP on the z10 BC (OSA-Express3 4 Port 1000BASE-T).
I understand that no OAT configuration is required as it is a Single LPAR,
Single TCP/IP use.
But if TCP/IP doesn't work, I will check the OAT and Configuration with a
OSA/SF (Query).
I'm checking the OSA/SF setup
5, 2021 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: OSA/SF
Hi,
I think there is a job that is provided in SYS1.SAMPLIB as member ATBTPVSM
Tony
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
(K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hello,
I was restoring multiple dumps but ran into an issue where only one dump
could not be restored due to IGD306I error.
The dumped and restored environments are different.
I could not find any details of the REASON CODE 1013 and issued messages
(IGD1 and IGD2).
Is there a cause and so
e:+81-90-4096-7700
2-14-5-1001, Ohkubo, Narashino, Chiba, Japan 275-0011
On 2021/10/07 12:58, (K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi wrote:
Hello,
I was restoring multiple dumps but ran into an issue where only one dump
could not be restored due to IGD306I error.
The dumped and restored environments are differ
Hello,
Can IBM 3590 tape drive be online at the same time with both LPARs?
If there is an LPAR that currently brought the *all drives* online, another
LPAR will issue an IEE791I.
IEE791I cuu VARY REJECTED - ASSIGNED TO ANOTHER SYSTEM
I understand that both LPARs cannot use tape drives at the
ards,
Nobuhiko Furuya(古谷信彦)
V-SOL Inc.
e-mail:furu...@v-sol.co.jp
On 2022/05/26 13:18, (K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi wrote:
Hello,
Can IBM 3590 tape drive be online at the same time with both LPARs?
If there is an LPAR that currently brought the *all drives* online,
another LPAR will issue an IEE791I
be automatically switched within a given sysplex, but can
only be used by 1 image at a time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
(K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 11:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Tape drive sharing
[CAU
Hello,
We are migrating data from 3592 to VTL.
The 3592 and VTL are both defined on the Mainframe as 3590 device.
The 3592 tape media has IDCAMS REPRO and DFDSS DUMP datasets.
The REPRO dataset could be copied and moved to VTL.
But, DFDSS DUMP datasets copy failed with copydump.
*IEF233A M 0A01
at 2:52 AM (K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi
wrote:
Hello,
We are migrating data from 3592 to VTL.
The 3592 and VTL are both defined on the Mainframe as 3590 device.
The 3592 tape media has IDCAMS REPRO and DFDSS DUMP datasets.
The REPRO dataset could be copied and moved to VTL.
But, DFDSS DUMP datasets c
19 matches
Mail list logo
