Hi all,
I should probably say "my problem with SORT SUM", as the real problem is
not with SORT.
So, I have an input file with a 100 byte record that has a dataset name on
the first 44 bytes and a numeric value (UFF) on the last ten.
I need to sum up those 10 last bytes by High Level Qualifier.
My
Jack,
The issue is you have NOT converted the UFF value to Binary before performing
the SUM
Here is the change you need (Untested)
//SYSINDD *
INREC PARSE=(%01=(ABSPOS=1,ENDBEFR=C'.',FIXLEN=8)),
BUILD=(FMT-HLQ:%01,
FMT-BYTE:INP-BYTE,TO=BI,LENGTH=8)
SORT FIELDS=(F
David
Not Really understanding what you are suggesting is there another c++ compiler
on z/os I should be using ?
As I am using CCNDRVR
Are you saying that the standard template libraries functions such as map wont
work with CNNDRVR
As an aside the following statement compiled fine under
Thank you Sri.
It was as simple as that.
Many thanks
Jack
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 12:46, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
> Jack,
>
> The issue is you have NOT converted the UFF value to Binary before
> performing the SUM
>
> Here is the change you need (Untested)
>
> //SYSINDD *
> INREC PARSE=(%01=(ABS
Hi all,
I'm facing a problem with SMF that is completely unusual, and maybe you can
enlight me.
I do have a program that generates SMF records and it is possible to specify
the SMF number
of any choice (bigger than 127). The SMF record is issued using SMFWTM macro.
I also have an IEFU83 and I
Check your PARMLIB SMFPRMxx member to insure the higher number is processed.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, January 31st, 2023 at 8:29 AM, Ituriel do Neto
<03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm facing a
Mr Pinion,
Thank you, but its not this problem.
The SMFPRMxx is correct, otherwise the SMF record would not be generated.
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer
Em terça-feira, 31 de janeiro de 2023 10:48:01 BRT, rpinion865
<042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv
Are you checking the return code from WTO?
Does the message show data from the SMF record or a boilerplate?
The snippet looks fine.
Show the code.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:29:16 + Ituriel do Neto
<03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>I'm facing a problem with SMF that is
I have done a small change, like below:
USING SMFRCD0,R9
DXSOTHR CLI SMF0RTY,128
BL DXSTYSU
WTO 'IEFU83 EXIT INVOKED'
** BAS R8,DXMSG <=== TE
I need to move my SMPe from one LPAR to another.
My concern are my MOUNTPOINTS.
My current zFS is ETC with a mountpoint of
/SERVICE/MVS1/etc
Do I need to mount the MP and go create the
/SERVICE/DEV1/etc
Then UNMOUNT and MOUNT it again as /DEV1/etc
Regards,
St
Exit IEFU86 is called first. Do you have a U86 exit doing something first?
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:30 PM Ituriel do Neto <
03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I have done a small change, like below:
>
> USING SMFRCD0,R9
> DXSOTHR CLI SMF0RTY,128
>
I assume you're not zfs file sharing? I usually don't mount etc or dev
unless I'm doing an upgrade, but if you're not sharing the /SERVICE/
filesystems then yes you need to create the mount points first - then
remount them on the moved-to LPAR
Carmen
On 1/31/2023 12:56 PM, Steve Beaver wrote:
I would like to thank you all.
As expected It was a logic error, before the piece of code shown.
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer
Em terça-feira, 31 de janeiro de 2023 15:58:01 BRT, Michael Babcock
escreveu:
Exit IEFU86 is called first. Do you have a
Hello Radoslav,
sorry for the delay, I usually rather follow vse-l
https://lists.lehigh.edu/mailman/listinfo/vse-l
In any case I was told by a friend (thank you Christian B.!) that there were
some VSEn questions, so here I am.
The HW req. are exactly the same as with IBM z/VSE 6.2, that is min.
I love symbols.
I've been trying to figure out if a level of indirection is possible.
Here's an example that both doesn't work and isn't' even syntactically correct,
but hopefully will serve to illustrate what I'm trying to do:
//SYM1 SET SYM1=VALUE1
//SYM2 SET SYM2=VALUE2
//TARGET SE
Not necessarily what you may want, but this works:
//SYM1 SET SYM1=VALUE1
//SYM2 SET SYM2=VALUE2
//TARGET SET TARGET=&SYM1
//RESULT SET RESULT=&TARGET (and end up with &RESULT being set to VALUE1
and not SYM1)
I know Gil will complain the observed JCL symbol behavior (assigning t
Unfortunately, you can not have "nested" symbols...just one and done.
Thank you and best regards,
Billy Ashton
-- Original Message --
From "Robert Garrett"
To IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date 1/31/2023 7:07:31 PM
Subject JCL // SET SYMBOL indirection
I love symbols.
I've been trying
I don't know about your question. But herewith a brief side hike:
I have always been inclined to experiment with systems, hoping to find sense
in what seemed like senseless behavior and looking for shortcuts.
(Apparently I was born to be a programmer.) When I was handed a form to
fill out, and t
>>//RESULT SET RESULT=&&TARGET (and end up with &RESULT being set to VALUE1
>>and not SYM1)
Rob,
Try this
// EXPORT SYMLIST=*
//SYM1 SET SYM1=VALUE1
//SYM2 SET SYM2=VALUE2
//TARGET SET TARGET=SYM1
//RESULT SET RESULT=&TARGET
/*
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:20:26 +, Farley, Peter wrote:
>Not necessarily what you may want, but this works:
>
>//SYM1 SET SYM1=VALUE1
>//SYM2 SET SYM2=VALUE2
>
>//TARGET SET TARGET=&SYM1
>
>//RESULT SET RESULT=&TARGET (and end up with &RESULT being set to VALUE1
>and not SYM1)
>
>I
20 matches
Mail list logo
