Are you checking the return code from WTO? Does the message show data from the SMF record or a boilerplate?
The snippet looks fine. Show the code. On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:29:16 +0000 Ituriel do Neto <000003427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: :>I'm facing a problem with SMF that is completely unusual, and maybe you can enlight me. :>I do have a program that generates SMF records and it is possible to specify the SMF number :>of any choice (bigger than 127). The SMF record is issued using SMFWTM macro. :>I also have an IEFU83 and IEFU84 SMF exits and since SMFWTM is being used, IEFU83 will :>be lunched to intercept the previously generated SMF record. :>Since it is in test, the first thing IEFU83 does is to WTO the SMF type and subtype it is processing, :>for debugging purposes. :>Now comes the strange part. if the SMF number is between 128 and 205 (inclusive), the WTO is :>issued normaly, but if the SMF number is bigger than 205 it seems the exit is not invoked because :>no WTO is issued at all. :>The SMF is generated correctly because I can extract it from SYS1.MANx datasets. :>Here goes a piece of code of IEF83/4 to ilustrate. :> USING SMFRCD0,R9 * MAPS SMF RECORD HEADER :>DXSOTHR CLI SMF0RTY,128 * SMF SYSTEM RECORD (<128)? :> BL DXSTYSU * YES, CHECK TYPE/SUBTYPE/PROD :> BAS R8,DXMSG <=== TEMP * DISPLAY AND RETURN :>DXSTYSU DS 0H :>Are there any kind of restriction because it is completely crazy. -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
