Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

I remember bent pins from not alighning the board properly before closing the door. I would expect back problems if you did a lot of wiring in situ. Side note: bitsavers does have EAM equipment, under -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

Ahhh---the fun days and dreamer days...1965 when I started(tab Opertor) after attending trade school -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 6:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was

Re: data set deletion problem

As far as I know, XCFAS would not allocate any data set other than what XCF itself needs (perhaps some sort of couple data set) and data sets in the LNKLST. If your data set is not in either of those categories, I cannot help. If there is no active LNKLST data set with the data set in question,

Re: my new z114

You are, of course, correct Shmuel. I should have included the very next sentence from the reference guide: "If you have experience with RPG, most of the concepts will be familiar as well; this is no coincidence, because RPG, too, has its roots in accounting machines." DJ ---

Re: How to force use of a single unix process to all bpxbatch calls?

It isn't really clear to me what you are trying to do other than some variation on /bin/find and then processing the resulting list of files. Are you are trying to start multiple concurrent processes? I can't tell. For your general description, you may want to start with a main rexx exec, its

SUSE Rancher products for IBM Z

Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-Main All, On May 3rd, 2022, SUSE announced that beginning tomorrow, June first, the following products will be available for IBM Z: - SUSE Rancher Manager - SUSE Rancher Kubernetes Engine 2 - Longhorn Storage For anyone not familiar with Rancher, whic

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

>From memory, the LEO (Lyons Electronic Office) computer of 1951/2 used decimal (not octal or hexadecimal) digits. I cannot find a reference to it, but this might help:   https://www.zdnet.com/article/inside-leo-the-first-business-computer/   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LEO_(computer)   On 30/0

Re: How to force use of a single unix process to all bpxbatch calls?

On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:08:57 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote: >It isn't really clear to me what you are trying to do other than some >variation on /bin/find and then processing the resulting list of files. > /bin/find is underappreciated. find -exec /bin/sh -xc " list of co

Re: How to force use of a single unix process to all bpxbatch calls?

find -exec is a generally poor choice for doing something efficiently, especially on z/OS. find -exec is an extremely popular way to demonstrate a heaping dose of impenetrable syntax On Tue, May 31, 2022, at 6:05 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:08:57 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote

Re: How to force use of a single unix process to all bpxbatch calls?

On Tue, 31 May 2022 20:44:49 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote: >find -exec is a generally poor choice for doing something efficiently, >especially on z/OS. > find ... | xargs -0 ... would be more efficient, but z/OS doesn't support xargs -0. Does Rocket's findutils do better? >find -exec is an extremely

JES2 spool outputs

Hello Recently for one of our LPAR seeing a spool percentage of 50%. With $DJOBQ,SPOOL=(%5) Shows me only one job which is taking 6% of spool. I have tried purging all outputs which are 7 days older but there is no relief to the spool percentage Tried purging TSU outputs, STC output too but no l