I last wrangled z/OS in any seriousness in the early 2000s, with z/OS 1.6.
Things have changed a bit. I got my zD&T LE system running last night
(protip: they're serious when they say only to use Red Hat or Ubuntu; not
even Pop!_OS, an Ubuntu derivative, will work), with z/OS 2.4.
IBM seems to hav
Hi Mark,
When a user attempts to select a job, SDSF does an authorization check for each
individual SYSOUT DDNAME associated with the job and can generate multiple
violations like this.
To address this issue, see article " Avoiding Output Browse Violation Messages
in SDSF" in the July 2008 iss
I've seen the first 2 already.
I looked at the last link.
I would like a macro or DSECT(s) that map the OMVS trace buffer.
Regards, Pierre.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
I think it is noteworthy to state that activating and implementing the
JESSPOOL class (and maybe also OPERCMDS) has implications beyond just SDSF.
The profiles for these classes will be checked for other software and
user/public tools, for example output archiving and automated operations
prod
Thanks for the link for the output violations - it doesn't appear to work for
TSS (Top Secret).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 8:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF & TSS (RACF)
A
On Mon, 23 May 2022, at 21:55, Steely.Mark wrote:
> Then select the job and receives the following messages:
>
> TSS7257E Unauthorized Access Level for JESSPOOL
>
> TSS7257E Unauthorized Access Level for JESSPOOL
>
> TSS7257E Unauthorized Access Level for JESSPOOL
>
Leaving aside the othe
Mark -
We use Top Secret as well and had the same issue that you are describing when
we initially activated JESSPOOL control. We happen to be using (E)JES instead
of SDSF, but essentially we did the same thing that Robert described here--we
use an (E)JES exit to alter the RACF call for JESSPOO
1. You're wrong. "what is allowed" is described in TSOPROC class.
2. Pity. However feel free to suggest better solution.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 20.05.2022 o 13:12, Seymour J Metz pisze:
1. TSO segments will only tell you what is allowed; you still need SMF to
tell how of
Due to the complexity of the analysis, why would not IPCS formatting
meet your needs?
Michael
At 08:38 AM 5/24/2022, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
I've seen the first 2 already.
I looked at the last link.
I would like a macro or DSECT(s) that map the OMVS trace buffer.
Regards, Pierre.
Hi Glenn,
Thank you for your information.
By the way, why does QUERYSET rexx require more than 20 seconds to
complete ?
Best regrads,
Nobuhiko Furuya(古谷信彦)
V-SOL Inc.
e-mail:furu...@v-sol.co.jp
On 2022/05/20 11:28, Glenn Wilcock wrote:
FYI - Here's a link to 8+ hours of video recordings of
No, he's right. You are, too (except about him being wrong). He said you
can't tell what's allowed by looking at the TSO segment, which is
true; you look for a profile in the TSOPROC resource class to see what's
permitted, which is what I gather you're saying.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gma
11 matches
Mail list logo
