Except that he is 100% incorrect. One of my client sites is currently running
z/OS 1.8 (which is certainly older than 1.10) on a bc12 (2828-H13). It (z/OS
1.8) has the toleration package so that we could run it on the z/114 that they
purchased back in 2012, which was since upgraded to a bc12 2
Oops, I may be wrong, I really should read what people have written completely.
The z/OS 1.8 system does work on the z13s at the DR site (which is running
z/VM, we have not tried it native), but you are correct that it "might" not run
on a z14 or z15. It might, but I have no way to test it. I
Hi,
Does anyone know of a way to query an ESM (RACF in this case) from a REXX
program running under TSO/E and ISPF?
We are currently at z/OS v2.2.
I would like to know if a user has a certain access level to a resource in
FACILITY.
Thanks
Gadi
-
Look at IRRXUTIL
ITschak
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 באוג׳ 2020, 14:06, מאת Gadi Ben-Avi :
> Hi,
> Does anyone know of a way to query an ESM (RACF in this case) from a REXX
> program running under TSO/E and ISPF?
> We are currently at z/OS v2.2.
>
> I would like to know if a user has a certain access leve
IRRXUTIL extracts information from the RACF Database for reporting.
It doesn't tell you if a user has access to a resource.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Itschak Mugzach
Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2020 2:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
You need to use this or wright an assembler program to execute a third
party check on the resource in question. Easier in rexx with irrxutil.
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 באוג׳ 2020, 14:20, מאת Gadi Ben-Avi :
> IRRXUTIL extracts information from the RACF Database for reporting.
> It doesn't tell you if a u
Shkoyach
On 2020-08-02 07:25, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
You need to use this or wright an assembler program to execute a third
party check on the resource in question. Easier in rexx with irrxutil.
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 באוג׳ 2020, 14:20, מאת Gadi Ben-Avi :
IRRXUTIL extracts information from the RAC
-)
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 באוג׳ 2020, 14:27, מאת David Spiegel <
dspiegel...@hotmail.com>:
> Shkoyach
>
> On 2020-08-02 07:25, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> > You need to use this or wright an assembler program to execute a third
> > party check on the resource in question. Easier in rexx with irrxutil.
>
Try issuing the "RLIST FACILITY .xxx AUTH" command and parse the results.
Also take a look at the RACFADM open source RACF admin dialog - CBT Tape file
417 or https://github.com/lbdyck/racfadm
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more about your character than your
What's the difference? Ibm does not recommend command output parsing as it
is prone to changes.
ITschak
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 באוג׳ 2020, 14:49, מאת Lionel B Dyck :
> Try issuing the "RLIST FACILITY .xxx AUTH" command and parse the
> results.
>
> Also take a look at the RACFADM open source RACF
What change does it make? IBM does ot recommend parsing of command output
as it keeps the right to change output format.
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring
for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM comming son *
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 2:49 PM Li
While IBM may reformat the probability is low that they will. They have a hard
enough time updating TSO Help panels when typos are found. However if they do
change the format then it shouldn't be difficult to update the parse.
With the RLIST just scan to the bottom and you will see this section
On 2020-08-01 18:47, Charles Mills wrote:
I only know for a fact that all of the swans I have ever seen were
white.
At least on the side of the swans that you saw.
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 4
Hi,
I have an old DS6800 running alongside my z114. Due to a power outage the
SAN was shut down uncleanly and
while it does not appear to indicate any failures in its logs or status
displays, I'm having issues trying to IPL my LPARs from it.
To try to debug this issue I loaded a z/VM installation
This could be the storage unit went into R/O mode to protect the existing data.
We’ve had that happen on similar old storage devices.
See if you can check the storage HMC which might reflect the condition. We had
to “fix” whatever caused this protective condition allowing R/W access.
Good luc
Thanks Jon,
I now see two new S/W problems, one mentioning that access to data has been
impacted. I looked when the SAN had booted but I guess I might have been a
bit too quick before that was self-diagnosed.
Oh well, reboot of the SAN it is.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:51 PM Jon Nolting wrote:
But that would mean checking if the user has access, or if the user has access
through any of the groups it is connected to.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lionel B Dyck
Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2020 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
There is no "might" about it. As shipped by IBM, nothing lower than
z/OS 1.12 will run on a z14 or z15. I don't know who you think "might"
know more about this particular topic than I do. I implemented the
code in z/OS 1.12 which allows it to IPL on a z14. I also know which
z/OS 1.12 modul
18 matches
Mail list logo
