Thats correct gil. A few IBM products run with NODSI intentionally. Looking
the I&T, looks like PSF, VLF, DLF, FFST, RMF, JES2, JES3, *MASTER*, SMF, CAS
I wouldn’t be changing them to DSI in SCHED00, as I am sure they are set that
way for good reason.
_
the following situation return abend0c7:
1. sort fields=(1,4,ch,a,9,5,ch,a)
sum fields=(245,15,ZD)
sum statement caused the abend. without sum, no issue.
2. run icetool verify and print. bothe ended with rc=0. print show
x'f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f5'
with seems to be ok.
why am I get
the following situation return abend0c7:
1. sort fields=(1,4,ch,a,9,5,ch,a)
sum fields=(245,15,ZD)
sum statement caused the abend. without sum, no issue.
2. run icetool verify and print. bothe ended with rc=0. print show
x'f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f5'
with seems to be ok.
why am I get
Just a wild guess here, is the SUM statement looking for a signed field?
From the DFSORT manual:
An invalid PD or ZD sign or digit results in a data exception (0C7 ABEND);
0-9are invalid for the sign and A-F are invalid for the digit. For example, a
ZDvalue such as 3.5 (X'F34BF5') results in an
Rex,
x'F5' is a valid sign for (positive) ZD field. I already read this section,
and the number to sum (all are the same) is valid ZD number.
ITschak
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:15 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Just a wild guess here, is the SUM statement looking for a signed field?
>
> From the DFSO
Isn't this 16 numbers and You are doing sum on 15
//Lasse
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List För ITschak
Mugzach
Skickat: den 24 oktober 2019 15:19
Till: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: [External] dfsort SUM processing
Rex,
x'F5' is a valid sign for (posi
No, and even if so, all are numbers and can be sub summerized with a valid
sign of F.
בתאריך יום ה׳, 24 באוק׳ 2019, 16:35, מאת Lars Höglund <
lars.hogl...@alecta.se>:
> Isn't this 16 numbers and You are doing sum on 15
>
> //Lasse
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discu
ITschak,
Yup, I misread the book. Sorry about that - and for the clutter...
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 8:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] dfsort SUM processing
Rex,
x'f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f5' is 16 digits or
But right, it should work anyhow even if You are doing sum on the first 15
//Lasse
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List För ITschak
Mugzach
Skickat: den 24 oktober 2019 15:37
Till: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
It is not a copy paste. I might count wrong.
בתאריך יום ה׳, 24 באוק׳ 2019, 16:44, מאת Lars Höglund <
lars.hogl...@alecta.se>:
> x'f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f5' is 16 digits or
>
> But right, it should work anyhow even if You are doing sum on the first 15
>
> //Lasse
>
> -Ursprungli
Hi,
Have you tried it with "CH" instead of "ZD"? For the intended purpose it
should work. And if yes, did it abend as well?
Best Regards
Joao Bentes de Jesus
"Do the difficult things while they are easy and do the great things while
they are small. A journey of a thousand miles must begin
I think CH is invalid for sum
בתאריך יום ה׳, 24 באוק׳ 2019, 17:10, מאת Joao Bentes <
joao.bentes.je...@pt.ibm.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Have you tried it with "CH" instead of "ZD"? For the intended purpose it
> should work. And if yes, did it abend as well?
>
> Best Regards
>
> Joao Bentes de Jesus
>
>
Yes, I think you are right. And if you tried it with 'BI'? Would it work?
Melhores Cumprimentos
Joao Bentes de Jesus
Best Regards
"Do the difficult things while they are easy and do the great things while
they are small. A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single
step."
Laozi
Fro
>>> why am I getting abend0c7?
ITschak Mugzach,
Couple of things to check. Do you have any records that have SPACES X'40'
or Decimal Dot X'4B' ? Both these would cause an S0C7.
If you say the VERIFY operator shows every record as valid, I would like to
see the Complete joblog( Both SORT+SUM and
In your mailbox.
ITschak
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:56 PM Sri h Kolusu wrote:
> >>> why am I getting abend0c7?
>
> ITschak Mugzach,
>
> Couple of things to check. Do you have any records that have SPACES X'40'
> or Decimal Dot X'4B' ? Both these would cause an S0C7.
>
> If you say the VERIFY op
> In your mailbox.
ITschak
Responded back. Probably an oversight. :) 125 and 245 are not one and
same. :D
Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
s
What we see:D SMS,PDSE1,CONNECTIONS,DSN(library) returns open status of input
for every PSF STC.D GRS,RES=(SYSDSN,library) returns nothing.
Consistent for SCHEDxx NODSI.
The PSF manual clearly states that DSI prevents other programs from updating
resource libraries while PSF is active.
It would b
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:15:08 +, David Purdy wrote:
>...
>It would be desirable to update a PDSE while DISP=SHR and DSI is set, without
>adversely impacting anyone. There is an exit to have PSF close an idle
>library, to be used in conjunction with DSI (if I'm reading the doc right).
>Bo
Not only is it useful, but IBM has shipped procedures that use it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 10:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.U
Please respond to what I wrote in this universe, not to what I might have win
some alternate universe. Which part of "I've written plenty of code that
invokes language processors and other utilities in a batch environment, as have
others, and I'd be very surprised if there weren't several such p
Au contraire. It is often useful. I see it used in cataloged procs all the
time. And I would be confident that Itschak knows what it does.
It is always easy to criticize anyone's question: "that's stupid! What would
you want to do that for?" but there is often a good reason were you to
understa
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:14:10 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
>Au contraire. It is often useful. I see it used in cataloged procs all the
>time. And I would be confident that Itschak knows what it does.
>
However, I once tried to use it by overriding a DD in a cataloged PROC
with DDNAME= so I could a
Lower case 'f' not same as 'F'. Not a valid sign or zone.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:45 PM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> the following situation return abend0c7:
> 1. sort fields=(1,4,ch,a,9,5,ch,a)
>sum fields=(245,15,ZD)
>sum statement caused the abend. without sum, no issue.
>
> 2. run ic
Sorry I know this is an incredibly naïve question.
I got my VSAM LDS defined and successfully mounted as a zFS path.
Imagine my surprise when the mount went away at IPL.
Where do I put a MOUNT statement such that the LDS will get mounted again at
each IPL? I searched KC, Init and Tuning, and S
BPXPRM00 in parmlib usually.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Thursday, October 24, 2019, 3:16 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Sorry – I know this is an incredibly naïve question.
I got my VSAM LDS defined and successfully mounted as a zFS path.
Imagine my surprise when the mount went away at IP
As Bill says. With the caveat that you are using suffix '00' on parms.
You will see the BPX mount parm referenced at IPL with the corresponding
file system mounts. Check for errors after IPL too (file not found etc.).
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:18 AM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@l
Okay, great, I see it. I searched SYS1.PARMLIB(*) but not the whole
concatenation.
Yeah, I understand the suffix thing.
Thanks!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Wayne Bickerdike
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:14:10 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
>there is often a good reason were you to understand the OP's
>entire situation and constraints.
I agree. In this case, I don't remember the OP telling us what
his situation and constraints are, though there was a lot of
speculation abou
Nothing I said was meant as criticism of the OP's question. And I said
nothing like your imaginary quote about anything.
What I did mean to imply is that DD DDNAME= is nothing like pipes, nor any
sense of "routing" I know of. As for its usefulness, I have myself found
it useful in some (rare) ca
BPXPRMnn
Matt Hogstrom
+1 (919) 656-0564
> On Oct 24, 2019, at 15:17, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Sorry – I know this is an incredibly naïve question.
>
> I got my VSAM LDS defined and successfully mounted as a zFS path.
>
> Imagine my surprise when the mount went away at IPL.
>
> Where do I p
It's in MVS Init & Tuning. My bad. I happened to have JES2 Init & Tuning open
on my desktop and at a quick glance thought I had MVS Init & Tuning open. MVS
I&T has relevant hits for MOUNT; JES2 I&T of course does not.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mail
Hi
I copied the example from the LE guide for 64 bit Virtual Storage Addressing
with the exception of zeroing service rtn address and go a return code X'20'
32
CALL (15),
(INIT_MAIN,
CEEXPTBL_
Hi
The example of CELQPIPI init_main references a C program that does not have
a main
Just tried on that has it and worked
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@lis
Can a program assembled with CELQPRLG be using as entry in the pre-init
table (CELQPITY)
As I am getting a X'20' 32 on a INIT_SUB call from CELQPIPI
thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
Good news! We have expanded the number of cities for this "Exploring z/OS
Container Extensions" Meetup to 11, with Sydney and Perth now available.
Here's the full list for 2019:
November 19: Singapore
November 20: Kuala Lumpur
November 22: Bangkok
November 25: Seoul
November 26: Manila
November 28
35 matches
Mail list logo
