Turns out it was plain stupidity(ours).
When the system was IPLed, we received(and missed) these messages:
IST1365I CONNECTION ATTEMPT TO STRUCTURE EZBEPORT FAILED 497
IST1366I MVS MACRO IXLCONN FAILED - RTN CODE= 0C - REASON CODE= 0C08
IST314I END
IXL013I IXLCONN REQUEST FOR STRUCTURE EZBEPOR
Even CFCC changes that you receive with MCL updates, could require to enlarge
structures.
This is mentioned in the MCL cover letters, but we were not always warned by
IBM and encountered the same surprise as you had.
The problem with these requirements is, that it could take a long time until
Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of
the active task” I was under the impression that the task is active just the RB
is suspended
Which is why it is place in bits 8 - 31 of the ECB
Thanks
-
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:54:09 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of
>the active task” I was under the impression that the task is active just the
>RB is suspended
What do you think it would mean for the task to be active when
I would think there is a new TCBRBP
> On Apr 1, 2019, at 8:44 AM, Tom Marchant
> <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:54:09 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>>
>> Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of
>> the
What is your question?
Show your code that is affected by the issue you perceive.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:54:09 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says performance of
the active task I was under the impression that the task is active just the
It’s nothing in my code just maybe I have a misunderstanding it was my
understanding
That a wait suspends the RB not the entire TCB that documentation seems to say
otherwise the entire TCB is suspended unless I didn’t read right
Thanks
> On Apr 1, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Binyamin Dissen
> wr
" Pervasive Encryption (uppercase) refers to the "encrypt everything" (even
multiple times, in multiple encryption layers) operational approach that
performs extremely well on IBM z14 and second generation LinuxONE machines
(Emperor II, Rockhopper II), using z/OS Data Set Encryption and/or all o
Well, the earlier RBs are already suspended. The unsatisfied WAIT places the
task in the non-dispatchable status.
It is possible to add an IRB to the task and the task would be dispatchable
and the IRB would run.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:07:18 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>Its nothing in my cod
We do it precisely for that reason. With old spinny drives, when one requires
replacing, we used to have to have arrangements with vendors to keep the
removed drives for shredding. With solid state storage, such an arrangement
would be prohibitively expensive, but if its encrypted its no prob
Only the top RB of a task is active; no work can be performed for the older RBs
until the older TB goes away or an SVC rearranges the chain, which I believe
that only one SVC ever did. When the RB goes into a wait state, the task can
only be dispatched after a POST or adding an asynchronous RB,
The task will only be dispatched if the top RB is active. So unless someone
schedules, e.g., an IRB, the task will be inactive until the RB is active.
Nit: in MVS the word "suspend" has a technical meaning that doesn't apply here.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
__
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:48:55 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>...
>Encrypted zFS is already available in z/OS 2.3. Please refer to APAR
>OA54005 and to Marna Walle's presentation ("The Latest in z/OS UNIX and
>zFS") for some more information.
>
Thanks.
>... Kees clarified the
>situation well: it
Hi
I’m trying to repro a VB sysadata file to linear file and am getting
incompatible input
Has anyone done this I would like to use the sysadata in a dataspace
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
I assume that by "linear" that you mean a zFS or other file on Unix/Windows
and not a VSAM linear data set. One might be tempted to say "USS file",
but that would result in a complete and utter hijacking of this thread :-)
Also, I'm not sure what tool that you are using to read/process the ADATA
I would actually want to get the sysadata into a dataspace and the only way I
know is a vsam linear file
> On Apr 1, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
> I assume that by "linear" that you mean a zFS or other file on Unix/Windows
> and not a VSAM linear data set. One might be tempted t
Correction: The latest version of the IBM Record Generator for Java, does
not require RDWs.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 3:07 PM Kirk Wolf wrote:
> I assume that by "linear" that you mean a zFS or other file on
> Unix/Windows and not a VSAM linear data set. One might be tempted to say
> "USS file
Wow. That's a requirement that I would have never imagined.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 3:16 PM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> I would actually want to get the sysadata into a dataspace and the only
> way I know is a vsam linear file
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 1, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> >
> > I as
You come up with the darnedest things!
IDCAMS REPRO would be my first thought, but I don't really know. There is
nothing special about a SYSADATA file. So the requirement is simply QSAM VB to
VSAM Linear. I have a bunch of experience processing SYSADATA but zero with
VSAM Linear. Can VSAM Linea
VSAM linear doesn't have records, variable or otherwise. It's an
undifferentiated list of pages. You map it into your address space and copy
data to it. If the OP wants to process those data in his program then he needs
to copy them in whatever format his program expects.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.
Given that you need the same code, plus a bit more, to get them into a linear
dataset as you need to get them into a dataspace, why not just copy them into a
dataspace?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discuss
If you want them in a dataspace, why not copy them into a dataspace? How does a
linear space do anything useful for your particular application?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
J
On 2019-04-01 16:15, Joseph Reichman wrote:
I would actually want to get the sysadata into a dataspace and the only way I
know is a vsam linear file
There is no need to use a LDS to put data in a data space or to access
the data. Read up on these to create and access a data space:
DSPSERV CR
Well the process was in place well before I ever joined. I am not aware of
the history of the strategy except to protect disks in the SAN. I had never
considered somebody actually walking in and taking both the SAN disks and
the SKLM servers also! That would be a breach. That being said, should w
Allan Staller wrote:
>My understanding is that this was a "hardware" feature and did not
>depend on DFSMS (except as possible an on/off switch).
>In you post you refer to PERVASIVE ENCRYPTION (z/14?) vs pervasive
>encryption (df/SMS). Can you comment on the prior posts requiring
>DF/SMS extended fo
I think a couple of separate things are possibly mixed up here.
- Batch is what is run as a batch job in an initiator or possibly too as an
STC, in contrast to online which is usually TSO, although you can run TSO and
USS in batch.
- My remark was referring to applications that might not support
26 matches
Mail list logo
