W dniu 2019-03-09 o 17:05, Barry Merrill pisze:
Construction sites in Ireland can not use the standard 220v tools,
they had to set up a 110 converter and network.
Battery powered hand tools have reduced that need somewhat.
Really? 110V?
Many places, including construction sites have a requireme
W dniu 2019-03-06 o 13:29, John McKown pisze:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:31 AM R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2019-03-05 o 21:37, John McKown pisze:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:34 PM Carmen Vitullo
wrote:
Great product, EasySMF !
blackhillsoftware.com
Forgot to mention: "The mainframe is going away. The
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 6:26 AM R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2019-03-06 o 13:29, John McKown pisze:
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:31 AM R.S.
> wrote:
> >
> >> W dniu 2019-03-05 o 21:37, John McKown pisze:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:34 PM Carmen Vitullo
> >> wrote:
> Great product, EasySMF !
> >
John McKown wrote:
>> What would you do if they insist to use database without paying for database
>> license?
>The database in question has a permanent license, so that it not a problem.
Excellent. Do you need to pay the vendor every x period? Or is that license
just an once-off annoyance?
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:37 AM Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> John McKown wrote:
>
> >> What would you do if they insist to use database without paying for
> database license?
> >The database in question has a permanent license, so that it not a
> problem.
>
> Exce
W dniu 2019-03-11 o 13:37, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
John McKown wrote:
What would you do if they insist to use database without paying for database
license?
The database in question has a permanent license, so that it not a problem.
Excellent. Do you need to pay the vendor every x period?
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:57 AM R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2019-03-11 o 13:37, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
> > John McKown wrote:
> >
> >>> What would you do if they insist to use database without paying for
> database license?
> >> The database in question has a permanent license, so that it not a
> pr
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>> I got burned by a similar situation. Some hardware broken down, but luckily
>> I could scavenge some 'newish' hardware. I tried to install windoze 2008, XP
>> and 98, only got a nasty BSOD during initial phase of installation despite
>> fiddling around with BIOS sett
I'm not sure what "While REGISTER 3 settles" means. Even on a pipelined machine
register settings appear to be synchronous; the only reason that a prorammer
needs to take pipelines into account is for performance, and hand optimization
can do the opposite of what you wanted when you move to a ne
Doesn't z/OS come with curl and wget these days?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 9:21
Don’t think so. RocketSoftware makes them available for download. I think the
key issue is they are GPL IIRC.
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” -
Hanlon’s Razor
> On Mar 11, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Seym
GPL v3 says "6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms of sections 4
and 5, provided that you also convey the machine-readable Corresponding Source
under the terms of this License, in one of these ways:"
They would still need a notice of ho
You are correct about GPL. The concern is likely historical and not the one
that would be made today. There is some discussion at the OMP about hosting
the Rocket Ports as a no-registration download. Regardless, USS needs a
serious facelift to include tools and utilities commonly available on
Well, it's not as bad as it used to be, but the original OE option was designed
around passing certification and was missing most of the tools that aren't
required but everyone has.
What is the current status of Perl, Python and Ruby in z/os? What about bash?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http:/
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:52 AM Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> You are correct about GPL. The concern is likely historical and not the
> one that would be made today. There is some discussion at the OMP about
> hosting the Rocket Ports as a no-registration download. Regardless, USS
> needs a serious f
Here is a list of the tools Rocket Ported I just compiled for my reference for
discussions about what would be nice to have in USS … just my opinion, not an
IBM statement. Big priorities for me are bash, python, perl , git, sed.
Others are nice to have and often are used to build other packag
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:04:16 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>IMO, if IBM is really serious about z/OS UNIX being something other than a
>"POSIX compliant? Check!" portion of z/OS, they need to invest (pay) for a
>group to port and maintain all of the main GNU utilities that they don't
>have any real e
I would add gawk 4.x to that list, V4.2.1 if at all possible.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Matt Hogstrom
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: calling a webservice usi
I would like to invite anyone attending this week's SHARE conference in Phoenix
to come to my session entitled "Writing the Definitive Systems Programmer
Resume" (session 2, Wednesday, March 13, 2019: 1:45 PM-2:45 PM). This will
be the 12th time I have given this presentation at SHARE and i
Hi Joe,
Please send me the presentation.
Thanks and regards,
David Spiegel
On 2019-03-11 13:40, Joe Gallaher wrote:
> I would like to invite anyone attending this week's SHARE conference in
> Phoenix to come to my session entitled "Writing the Definitive Systems
> Programmer Resume" (session 24
Is the overhead noticeable from a thruput standpoint?
Say we have a 100 MSU box and a 200 MSU box capped at 100 will same workloads
complete in close proximity?In a message dated 3/4/2019 9:36:11 PM Central
Standard Time, edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes:
So a better analogy might be that eac
On the full speed box the delays will be real. On the faster
kneecapped box the delays will be counted as part of the kneecapping.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:40 PM Edward Finnell
<000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Is the overhead noticeable from a thruput standpoint?
>
> S
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:18:55 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>The 360/40 had one: 7 us for LR, 10 us for L.
>
>It is not possible now. A single instruction may literally add no time at
>all to some instruction sequence.
>
>My imperfect model is that main storage is the new disk. Figure that
>instructio
23 matches
Mail list logo
