Hi
I have built a test lpar and while loading I received
A disabled Wait state of
002088
I checked in manual it says because of I/O error
The Auxillary storage manager detected a paging I/O error when attempting
to read from or write to storage-class memory (SCM). the
Peter
You are looking at the system completion code 088 and not the wait state
code 088
Wait state code(with reason 000) is
* IPL could not find the LOADxx member in SYSn.IPLPARM on the IODF volume
or SYS1.PARMLIB on the IODF volume or on SYSRES. Either the system
programmer did not create the m
Hi Mike
It's a mini system I built, Res volume , IODF volume are same as 5224.
I have defined LOAD00 in SYS1.PARMLIB.
So the load address is 5224
And load parm is 522400
Before disconnecting the master catalogued I did verified that SYS1.PARMLIB
was catalogued under the Mini system master catal
Hi John,
I got this email when I was looking for ways to produce RMF spreadsheets
with CPU, Memory etc usage. I cannot use the RMF Spreadheet reporting
because of FTP connection access issues. Can you please kindly send me also
the codes you've mentioned.
Gregorio Tirona
zOS support
IBM
On Wed,
OK, you need HMC. As you said, you don't need the HMC to be connected
to your "mainframe" (zPDT).
You can buy or rent one, this is business issue. If you want to save
money, take n-2 generation from second hand.
I doubt someone wolud decide to give you remote access to working HMC.
From techn
If I told you the relevant fields were SMF70LAC, SMF70LACM, SMF70LACA,
SMF70LACB would that help? The last two are almost certainly zero,
SMF70LACM also zero if not using Mobile Workload Pricing the "new" way.
Those names are what they're called in the raw SMF record mapping; TDS
might call the
There is no reason to discuss with wait state explanation. ;-)
Maybe you also have SYS1.IPLPARM on this volume?
Note: LOADxx library is not searched via catalog. The MCAT name is
inside of LOADxx.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-02-04 o 10:36, Peter pisze:
Hi Mike
It's a m
Peter
Is SYS1.PARMLIB on device number 5224? As Radolaw mentioned, it is too
early in the IPL for any catalog access.
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 12:04, R.S. wrote:
> There is no reason to discuss with wait state explanation. ;-)
> Maybe you also have SYS1.IPLPARM on this volume?
> Note: LOADxx librar
Would changing the load parm to 522400M to display progress messages help
isolate the problem.
What volume is SYS1.PARMLIB on?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Peter
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 1:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subje
SYS1.PARMLIB is on same volume 5224
On Mon, 4 Feb, 2019, 4:54 PM retired mainframer Would changing the load parm to 522400M to display progress messages help
> isolate the problem.
>
> What volume is SYS1.PARMLIB on?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> >
This will also depend if NON-VSAM or VSAM or MIXED
You could DFDSS Dump Restore with Renames
Or you could write a REXX if NON-VSAM to do REN in TSO
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Nai, Dean
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 9:23 AM
I used mark zelden rexx sample to achieve this and it worked .
The rexx sample is indirect cataloging sample at his website www.mzelden.com
and customise as per hour requirement
On Mon, 4 Feb, 2019, 8:28 PM John McKown On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:23 AM Nai, Dean wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >I have
You should be able to generate the SYSIN cards to do the renames in a simple
REXX program and then use IDCAMS to do the renames using ALTER.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nai, Dean
Sent: Monday, February 04, 201
Hi,
I have almost 1000 datasets I need to rename from say xxx.xxx.xxx to
yyy.xxx.xxx.xxx where yyy would always be the same qualifier. Any thoughts on
be best utility to accomplish this?
Dean Nai
>
--
For IBM-M
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:23 AM Nai, Dean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I have almost 1000 datasets I need to rename from say xxx.xxx.xxx to
> yyy.xxx.xxx.xxx where yyy would always be the same qualifier. Any thoughts
> on be best utility to accomplish this?
>
Personally, I would probably go with Lizette'
I will go with Lizette's suggestion. Thanks everyone for your responses.
Dean
On 2/4/19, 11:27 AM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of John McKown"
wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:23 AM Nai, Dean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>I have almost 1000 datasets I need to rename from say
Hi Lizette,
There is a mixture. I was originally thinking the DFDSS solution you named
but I just thought I'd ask. Thanks for your help.
Dean
On 2/4/19, 11:25 AM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Lizette
Koehler" wrote:
>This will also depend if NON-VSAM or VSAM or MIX
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Nai, Dean
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: renames
Hi,
I have almost 1000 datasets I need to rename from say xxx.xxx.xxx to
yyy.xxx.xxx.xxx where yyy would always be the
Yes, z is (mostly) physical, but many of the mainframe in the same line were
not.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2019 3:22 PM
To: IBM-
AFAIK there are ways to zeroize CryptoExpress engines using HMC/SE
facilities, but this is to zeroize whole card - all domains.
Is there any method to zeroize CryptoExpress master keys from ICSF?
I would like to "clean up" the domain after myself.
I'm aware there's an option to simply enter new
You need to use caution with VSAM. AFAIK ALTER will rename only the object(s)
specified in the command, which unless you take extra measures may well be only
the cluster name. But VSAM components (DATA, INDEX) each have their own names.
Since you're changing the HLQ, the object(s) might well wi
Hello listers,
I'm still working this issue and just to let you all know my networking
expertise is NIL and I'm still in a learning process as far as z/OS systems
programming goes, our systems programmer, who I was learning from, retired last
November and I got the privilege (if that is what yo
Maybe it is unclear 5224 is SYSRES?
Has IPLTEXT been written to 5224?
Maybe create a SYS0.IPLPARM(LOADxx) on 5224 to see if you can progress?
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:36 AM Peter wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> It's a mini system I built, Res volume , IODF volume are same as 5224.
>
> I have defined LOAD0
Have you checked the selection criteria? The status of each of the pieces? My
guess is that something isn't active.
Of course, it could be a firewall issue, but check that everything is working
on the JES2 side before looking at that.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
I'm using ADPLSEQS to define a symbol in an IPCS verb exit.
I'm trying to define a symbol to a dataspace.
When I issue "L symbol" I get
LIST 00. ASID(X'0046') LENGTH(X'01') AREA(Symbol)
ASID(X'0046') ADDRESS(00.) KEY(08) PREFIXED
I can issue "L symbol DSPNAME(symbol)" but I wonder if I can
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:25:37 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>This will also depend if NON-VSAM or VSAM or MIXED
>
>You could DFDSS Dump Restore with Renames
>
I believe DFDSS Restore does not support changing the number of qualifiers
as the OP asked. There are competing ISV products that can do th
I does, just not with masking.Fully qualified RENAMEU pairs for every
dataset is what is required.
_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 21:17:26 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> What ever became of the venerable practice of interleaving replies close to
>> the paragraphs to which they refer
>
>B0rken e-mail software that makes difficult to DTRT, and, in some cases,
>management that actually directs doing the wro
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 01:53, Ed Jaffe wrote:
> Is it no longer possible to use "old school" shared DASD RESERVE/RELEASE
> to protect data? I know it won't work for sharing PDSE, but for
> old-school PDS and sequential, it should still work.
Reserve/Release works only if someone issues those CCW
In article <6648609332066356.wa.zos.jes2gmail@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> I'm using ADPLSEQS to define a symbol in an IPCS verb exit.
> I'm trying to define a symbol to a dataspace.
> When I issue "L symbol" I get
> LIST 00. ASID(X'0046') LENGTH(X'01') AREA(Symbol)
> ASID(X'0046') ADDRESS(00.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 01:10, Brian Westerman
wrote:
>
> Do you have any figures for how much "more" friendly the CPU usage is?
Funny thing... More than 40 years ago VM/370 was able to detect the
standard TIO/BC loop when issued in a virtual machine, and instead of
allowing it to eat CPU time, di
This one caught my attention. I trotted off to look up AMBLIST, and it looks
like it's a utility useful to assembler programmers (see
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieav100/amblist.htm).
I suspect that to one of my ignorance it won't tell me anythi
AMBLIST if used properly will tell you what ptf eyecatches are embedded in a
load module in a runtime loadlib - this might enable you to determine how much
of what has been APPLY'd to a CSI ever found its way to the runtime load
library
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastr
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:58:42 -0500, Bob Bridges wrote:
>I don't know what I would see in an ABMLISTing that would tell me anything I
>need to know about a CSI.
AMBLIST will tell you about a load module (or program object). Given enough
knowledge about the load module, it can tell you if it is co
I am refining our DR procedures. After I restore the DFHSM CDSs from the most
recent back-up, I need to update so as to not overwrite that back-up with the
next occurrence of CDS backup. The fine manual says to use FIXCDS S MHCR
PATCH(X'B1' nnn) to set the next back-up number.
FIXCDS requir
FOR EXAMPLE
//STEP0050 EXEC PGM=AMBLIST,REGION=0M
//DSNLOAD DD DISP=SHR,DSN=DB2.DSNLOAD
(this is not complete JCL)
//SYSINDD *
LISTIDR MODLIB,DDN=DSNLOAD
Will produce that includes
CSECT:DSNAA
01/15/2013 RSI23571390
CSECT:DSNACA00
Paul Gilmartin wrote, re reply styles:
>Indeed. Some prohibit editing quoted text, deeming it a form of forgery.
>That leads to a pernicious accumulation of footers and a secular bloat of text.
Sigh. Not that this isn't an ancient and unlikely-to-be-resolved issue, but I'm
of the strong
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 21:12:15 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
>>Indeed. Some prohibit editing quoted text, deeming it a form of forgery.
>>That leads to a pernicious accumulation of footers and a secular bloat of
>>text.
>
>... For corporate
>communications, top-posting isn't a bad thing: folks get
On 2019-02-04 21:39, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I thought I recalled a MUA where Preferences gave the option of positioning
the text input cursor at either top of bottom when replying. Today I see that
in neither Mac Mail.app nor Thunderbird.
In Thunderbird, look in your account settings. Under com
Random thoughts...
The fundamental issue is that email isn't the best way to handle online
group conversations. Many better solutions have been offered, from NNTP,
Notes, Stack Exchange, Slash Dot, and Lord knows how many others. SX is
extremely protective of their software, and for whatever rea
Why would overwriting the CDSs during a CDS backup be a problem? You still
have the media they were restored from and can recreate that version at
will.
If you don't want to run a special ARCCMDxx and you don't want to issue the
FIXCDS command manually, what other approach did you have in mind?
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:06:43 -0500, Gord Tomlin wrote:
>
>In Thunderbird, look in your account settings. Under composition and
>addressing, you will find what you want.
>
Ah! Account specific because I might want different behaviors for my work
account and my personal account.
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019
Thank you so much all. It worked after placing LOAD00 in SYS1.IPLPARM
On Mon, 4 Feb, 2019, 9:57 PM Steve Horein Maybe it is unclear 5224 is SYSRES?
> Has IPLTEXT been written to 5224?
> Maybe create a SYS0.IPLPARM(LOADxx) on 5224 to see if you can progress?
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:36 AM Pe
43 matches
Mail list logo
