This may have been copied at one time, been so long since I've used it
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Gilmartin" <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:18:18 PM
Subject: ISPBTCH JCLLIB? (w
Indeed Lizette, that's what I did, went straight to the source or function to
see the acceptable values.
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:18:35 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=FS
So I went
well that makes sense to me now, I'm still running 2.2
thanks
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Neubert"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 4:15:40 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=FS
FS setting appears to be new for V2R3.
Regards,
Kev
You will be MISSED.
--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) <
Mainframe Systems Programmer – RavenTek Solution Partners
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of J
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:29:04 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>well that makes sense to me now, I'm still running 2.2
>thanks
Just to be clear, is the OP running z/OS 2.3?
If so, perhaps an RFE is in order to bring ISMF in agreement with DFSMS.
--
Tom Marchant
Question :
What happened with IPOUPDTE in zOS 2.1 , zOS 2.2 or zOS 2.3 :
http://gsf-soft.com/Documents/IPOUPDTE.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 19:33:14 -0500, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>I’m looking to detect differences across the LPARs in terms of shared storage
>and want to pull together an aggregate view.
I wonder if an API into the active IODF would help.
I don't know if such is available.
--
Tom Marchant
---
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 08:41:27AM -0500, John Eells wrote:
> Friday, 14 December 2018, will be my last day at IBM. For the
> curious, I started on a Wednesday, 1 June 1977, so it will be 41
> years, 6 months since I started as a CE in the local Poughkeepsie
> branch office.
>
> It's time to shed
John,
Thanks for all that you have done and best wishes in your retirement!
Peter Vander Woude
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-
I'm chasing another problem where an LE program (COBOL) gets into an endless,
rather tight loop in CEEPLPKA after an S04E abend I'm trying to understand the
relation between I/O interrupt system trace entries, and a pair of SSRV
entries that very often follow the I/O entry. Here is a sampl
Agrrr.. Sorry for the misformatted mail. Trying again.
I'm chasing another problem where an LE program (COBOL) gets into an endless,
rather tight loop in CEEPLPKA after an S04E abend I'm trying to understand the
relation between I/O interrupt system trace entries, and a pair of SSRV
ent
W dniu 2018-12-12 o 16:17, Hervey Martinez pisze:
Well, the DFSMS manual states that RECORG=FS is valid. Once again, this issue
is in creating a test case in ISMF; have not tried it in JCL.
Really? Which manual?
Can you provide the link?
Before I asked I checked JCL Ref for z/OS 2.3 and check
W dniu 2018-12-13 o 17:28, R.S. pisze:
W dniu 2018-12-12 o 16:17, Hervey Martinez pisze:
Well, the DFSMS manual states that RECORG=FS is valid. Once again,
this issue is in creating a test case in ISMF; have not tried it in JCL.
Really? Which manual?
Can you provide the link?
Before I asked I
IMHO nothing.
I'm pretty sure it was used during ServerPac installation process, so it
is still present. At least in z/OS 2.2
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2018-12-13 o 15:12, Michael Williams pisze:
Question :
What happened with IPOUPDTE in zOS 2.1 , zOS 2.2 or zOS 2.3 :
htt
Yup, I found this also, the referenced manual points to page 289 of the DFSMS
manual for read only variables
&RECORG The data set record organization,
one of:
KS VSAM key sequenced (KSDS)
ES VSAM entry sequenced (ESDS)
RR VSAM relative record (RRDS)
LS VSAM linear
FS VSAM linear z
Yes, they are part of the I/O interrupt processing, and are not related
to the interrupted program (unless the I/O operation that caused
the interrupt is related to the interrupted program) .
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
> From: "Peter Hunkele
Ditto - thanks for everything.
BTW I retired more than 5 years ago and have never looked back since.
All the best in your retirement, John. Enjoy it.
Cheers,
Chris Poncelet CEng MBCS CITP
(retired Sysprog Consultant)
On 13/12/2018 14:47, Peter Vander Woude wrote:
> John,
>
> Thanks for a
I have opened a PMR/SR with SMS L2 on the missing FS in z/OS V2.3.
HELP Panel in TEST do not list FS
TEST in ISMF says value FS is not valid
Using PF1 it does not include FS as a valid value.
As well as indicating that it seems some of the SMS Manuals were RECORG is used
an it lists the valu
Great Lizette, thanks for the heads up
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 1:11:01 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=FS
I have opened a PMR/SR with SMS L2 on the missing FS in z/OS V2.3.
HELP Panel
Hmmm, do we need a compatibility level set for prior levels?
In a message dated 12/13/2018 1:14:18 PM Central Standard Time,
cvitu...@hughes.net writes:
Great Lizette, thanks for the heads up
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
A compatibility PTF would be great for folks, like me, moving forward to 2.3
and wanting this functionality before hand, and having the ability to test the
routines that match the new read only variables.
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Edward Finnell" <000248cce9f3-
. APAR OA56544 was created to address this issue.
The current target date for the PTF is 2/22.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Edward Finnell
> Sent: Thursday, De
John,
Thank you for all your excellent detailed explainers over the years,
your contributions are greatly appreciated.
If you miss us, er, mainframes, I think it's safe to say we would welcome you
back!
Wishing you happiness,
Mike Baldwin
Cartagena Software Ltd.
---
Yummy, thanks for the update.
In a message dated 12/13/2018 1:59:09 PM Central Standard Time,
stars...@mindspring.com writes:
APAR OA56544 was created to address this issue.
The current target date for the PTF is 2/22.
John,
Yes.. please feel free to visit the list and say hi. You have been an
awesome addition to IBM-Main over the years. I hope retirement is great.
Any chance that you can be downloaded to Watson and continue your IBM-Main
existence?
Rob Schramm
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 3:02 PM Mike Baldwin
thanks Lizette
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 1:58:48 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=FS
. APAR OA56544 was created to address this issue.
The current target date for the PTF is 2/22.
Li
Just got this from George Deluca via the SPFLite mailing list, it's great
news, but...
Hi,
I had always promised you wouldn't be bothered often by SPFLite
announcements, but this one is a bit more important.
Version 10.1.8350 has been made available on the Website. As of this
release, SPFLite h
Rob,
Good call! I wish I had thought of it first!
However, there is a downside to that suggestion: The PHBs will think we are
redundant and hire a PFCSK. Think Alexa or Siri. :-(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rob S
>Yes, they are part of the I/O interrupt processing, and are not related
to the interrupted program (unless the I/O operation that caused
the interrupt is related to the interrupted program) .
Thanks, Jim.
Can you say something about when they occur and when not? Just curious because
ICYDIE is Media Manager's Disabled Interrupt Exit for I/O interrupts,
I would guess that ICYDIE called an exit owned by the caller of
Media Manager, and that exit did the RELEASE for some unit of
work that it had PAUSEd to wait for the I/O to complete. From the
SSRV 11F trace entry, 1EE5C3D
Thanks for the notice Rob. Here's hoping a motivated user picks up the flag
and runs with it.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robert Prins
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
31 matches
Mail list logo
